Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19311 (RAJ)

SATYAPAL PAREEK S/O SHRI GHANSHYAM PAREEK v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLW/2031/2024 · 2026-01-21

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:2760] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 2031/2024 Satyapal Pareek S/o Shri Ghanshyam Pareek, Aged About 52 Years, R/o Triveni Water Point, Oil Factory, Baran, Rajasthan ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. 2. Director General, Anti-Corruption Bureau, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. Central Bureau Of Investigation, Tilak Marg Jaipur Through Its Head Office. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sunil Shekhawat for Ms. Preeti Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP Mr. Shyam Singh Yadav, SPP for CBI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 21/01/2026 Learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel appearing for the CBI submit that in the present matter, a negative final report has been submitted against all the persons. Learned counsel for the petitioner has not disputed the submissions made by the learned counsels for respondents. In view of the same, the present criminal writ petition stands dismissed as having become infructuous. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/16