NARENDRA KUMAR S/O SHRI SHYORAM JAKHAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/14967/2025 · 2026-01-23
Pramil Kumar Mathur
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19310 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19310 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:3312] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14967/2025 Narendra Kumar S/o Shri Shyoram Jakhar, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Near Krishi Upaj Mandi, Nayabas Road, Neem Ka Thana, Police Station Kotwali, District Sikar. ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ajay Kumar Natawaria Ms. Anubha Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Devi Singh, PP Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 23/01/2026
1. Apprehending his arrest in connection with FIR No.06/2015 registered at P.S. CID Jaipur, District CID (SOG) for offences under Sections 420, 120-B of IPC and Sections 4, 5, 6, 6-A of Rajasthan Public Examination (Use of Unfair Means) Act, 1992, the petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 482 BNSS.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the allegation levelled against the present petitioner is that he facilitated the co-accused in cheating in the examination for Junior
[2026:RJ-JP:3312] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-14967/2025] Accountant and Tehsil Revenue Accountant, 2015. He again submits that co-accused Kailash Chand, Dinesh Kumar, Sohan Lal, Sarita Beniwal, Dinesh Dhaka, Shree Ram Godara, Sunili, Prakash Kumar, Mukesh Manjhu and Ram Kishan Bishnoi have already been granted benefit of anticipatory bail by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide orders dated 22.02.2024, 14.10.2025 and
22.03.2024. Hence, the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
5. Considering the fact that the petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the investigation of the case, and similarly situated co-accused have been granted benefit of anticipatory bail by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it just and proper to allow the bail application of the petitioner.
6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 482 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that in the event of arrest of the Narendra Kumar S/o Shri Shyoram Jakhar, he shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:- (i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the
[2026:RJ-JP:3312] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-14967/2025]
facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and (iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/221