2026:HHC:35422 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No.7764 of 2024 Date of decision: 20.08.2026. __________________________________________________________ Raman Kumar & Others ....Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh ....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioners : Mr. Suresh Singh Saini, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Raj Negi, Deputy Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that on account of certain subsequent developments, the petitioners be allowed to withdraw this petition with liberty to them to approach the authorities afresh on the issue raised by them in the present petition. Without making any observation on the merits of the case, the petition, as prayed for, is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. It is observed that in case each of the petitioners independently approaches the authority by 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2026:HHC:35422 way of a representation within a period of four weeks, then appropriate call be taken on the said representations by the authority within 12 weeks from the date of receipt of the same. Petition stands disposed of along with pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge (Ranjan Sharma) Judge August 20, 2026 [Shivender]