Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19304 (RAJ)

ASHOK MANDAL S/O SAMBHOLI MANDAL v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/13878/2025 · 2026-02-05

Sandeep Taneja

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:5341] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13878/2025 Ashok Mandal S/o Sambholi Mandal, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Village Lakshmipur, P.S. Lokaha, District Madhubani, Bihar. (At Present Confined At Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Satish Kumar Khandal with Mr. Aditya Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP TANEJA Order 05/02/2026 1. The present bail application has been filed by the accused-petitioner under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. in connection with F.I.R. No.114/2025 registered at Police Station Vidhyadhar Nagar, District Jaipur City (North) for the offence(s) punishable under Section(s) 331(6), 109(1), 309(6) & 311 B.N.S. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and has nothing to do with the alleged offences. Learned counsel further submits that the injuries sustained by the complainant are simple in nature; that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent and recovery has already been made from him. Learned counsel also submits that the petitioner is in custody since 09.05.2025 and the charge-sheet has been filed in the matter. He submits that no further recovery is required to be made from the petitioner and his custodial [2026:RJ-JP:5341] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-13878/2025] interrogation is also not required. Thus, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in custody and therefore, prays that the petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner hereinabove. 4. Heard learned counsel for both the parties and perused the material available on record. 5. Taking into consideration the overall facts & circumstances of the case; the arguments advanced by learned counsel for both the parties, period of custody, the fact that charge-sheet has been filed, the petitioner has no criminal antecedent and none of the injuries sustained by the complainant is dangerous to life as well as trial is likely to take considerable time in its conclusion, thus, without commenting anything upon the merits / demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on regular bail. 6. Therefore, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and the accused-petitioner, namely Ashok Mandal S/o Sambholi Mandal, is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.2,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.1,00,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, with the following conditions:- (i) The accused-petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or influence the witness in any manner. [2026:RJ-JP:5341] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-13878/2025] (ii) The accused-petitioner shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the Law. (iii) The accused-petitioner shall attend the hearing of the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial Court or as and when asked to appear before the Trial Court. (iv) Violation of any of the above conditions shall be a sufficient ground for the Trial Court to cancel the bail granted to the petitioner by this Court. 7. The accused-petitioner Ashok Mandal S/o Sambholi Mandal, is directed to mark his presence on 15th of every month till conclusion of trial before the concerned police station. The SHO of the concerned police station shall send the presence report of the accused-petitioner to the trial Court on the same day of every month. In case of any breach of the above condition, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move an application against the petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 8. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned SHO for necessary compliance. (SANDEEP TANEJA),J SAHIL SONI /25