SATWINDER KAUR AND OTHERS v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER
CRM-M/5822/2026 · 2026-05-22
Mandeep Pannu
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19304 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19304 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
260
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
SATWINDER KAUR AND OTHERS STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU
Present: Ms. Kamlesh, Advocate for
Ms. Bandana Dogra, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Surinderjit S. Nahar, Asstt. A.G, Punjab.
MANDEEP PANNU, J (ORAL)
After arguing for some time, learned counsel for that she does not want to pursue the as withdrawn with liberty
Ordered accordingly.
22.05.2026 himanshu
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SATWINDER KAUR AND OTHERS VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Ms. Kamlesh, Advocate for Ms. Bandana Dogra, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Surinderjit S. Nahar, Asstt. A.G, Punjab.
MANDEEP PANNU, J (ORAL) er arguing for some time, learned counsel for he does not want to pursue the present petition with liberty to file fresh one with better particulars. Ordered accordingly. (
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CRM-M-5822-2026 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 22.05.2026 .....PETITIONERS .....RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Ms. Bandana Dogra, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Surinderjit S. Nahar, Asstt. A.G, Punjab. er arguing for some time, learned counsel for petitioners submits present petition and the same be dismissed file fresh one with better particulars.
(MANDEEP PANNU)
JUDGE (O&M)
submits and the same be dismissed HIMANSHU 2026.05.22 17:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document