Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 193 (PNJ)

MS AASHI CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/8031/2026 · 2026-03-30

Deepak Sibal, Lapita Banerji

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIG Sr. No.152 M/S AASHI CON STATE OF HAR CORAM : HON HON Present : Mr. Ms. DEEPAK SIBAL 1. Lear satisfied if the pres Excise and Taxati on the representati 2. Lear if the above prayer 3. Acco the writ petition is on the representati passing a speakin parties and in acc receipt of a copy o 4. Need petitioner and if th liberty to challenge 30.03.2026 Prince E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HAR I CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Versus HARYANA AND OTHERS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA B Mr. Shiv Kumar, Advocate for the petit s. Mamta Singla Talwar, DAG, Hary * * * * * IBAL, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner subm he present writ petition is disposed of wi Taxation Officer-cum-Proper Officer, Fa sentation dated 12.08.2025 (Annexure P Learned State counsel, who appears on prayer is accepted. Accordingly, at this stage, without com ition is disposed of with a direction to re sentation dated 12.08.2025 (Annexure P peaking order and after granting oppor in accordance with law, preferably with copy of this order. Needless to add that the decision so d if the decision is not to the satisfactio allenge the same, in accordance with law Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / Whether reportable : Yes / HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-8031-2026(O&M) Date of decision: 30.03.2026 .…. PETITIONER ..... RESPONDENTS PAK SIBAL ITA BANERJI e petitioner. , Haryana. r submits that at this stage, he would be of with a direction to respondent No.2 cer, Faridabad (East) to take a decision P-8), submitted by the petitioner. ars on advance notice, has no objection ut commenting on the merits of the case, to respondent No.2 to take a decision ure P-8) submitted by the petitioner, by opportunity of hearing to all affected ly within two months from the date of ion so taken be communicated to the sfaction of the petitioner, it would be at ith law. [DEEPAK SIBAL] JUDGE [LAPITA BANERJI] JUDGE Yes / No Yes / No &M) 2026 uld be 2- on ection case, cision er, by fected ate of to the be at PRINCE SAINI 2026.04.02 08:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document