Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 193 (CAL)

AMIT ROY v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/1267/2026 · 2026-03-19

Reetobroto Kumar Mitra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

19/03 2026 AD-04/24 266312 NANDY (CO-DO) In the High Court at Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side WPA 1267 of 2026 AMIT ROY Vs. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & Ors. Mr. Sudip Ghosh Chowdhury, Advocate Ms. Shreyeta Mitra, Advocate Ms. Pritha Biswas, Advocate Ms. Upasana Sarkar, Advocate …...for the Petitioner Mr. Kunal Ganguly, Advocate ……for the WBBSE Mr. Sunit Kumar Roy, Advocate ……for the WBSSC Ms. Debangana Dey, Advocate ……for the State 1. Affidavit of service, as filed, be kept with the record. 2. In spite of service, the School Authority is not represented. 3. The petitioner is an Assistant Teacher (S.C.) in Physical Education at Korekhali Milani Sikshaniketan (HS), Purba Medinipur. 4. The petitioner has made an application for transfer on own seeking on medical ground. 5. The said application is pending since 2025. 6. The respondent no. 6 is directed to conduct the requisite medical test and if satisfied, to issue requisite ‘No Objection Certificate’ and forward the same to the respondent no. 5 by 15.04.2026. 7. The suspension of ‘Utsashree Portal’ will not be an impediment for the concerned authority to consider the appli8cation for transfer of the petitioner. The same shall be considered in an offline mode. 8. With these observations, WPA 1267 of 2026 is disposed of. No order as to costs. (Reetobroto Kumar Mitra, J.) P a g e | 2