$~49 & 55 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010426072026 + CONT.CAS(C) 1653/2026 & CM APPL. 61104/2026 MUKESH KHER .....Petitioner Through: Petitioner in-person. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Piyush Beriwal, Ms. Ruchita Srivastava, Mr. Sparsh Jain, Mr. Sumit Ranjan, Advocates for R1 & R2. Mr. Shiv Shankar and Ms. Pragya Verma, Advs. for Mr. Yogesh Saini. Mr. Gulshan Kumar Sachdev and Ms. Aayushi Singh, Advs. for HDFC Bank. (55) # CNR No. DLHC010351612026 + W.P.(C) 10932/2026 & CM APPL. 60940/2026 CM APPL. 61989/2026 CM APPL. 61990/2026 CM APPL. 63560/2026 MUKESH KHER .....Petitioner Through: Petitioner in-person. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Piyush Beriwal, Ms. Ruchita Srivastava, Mr. Sparsh Jain, Mr. Sumit Ranjan, Advocates for R1 & R2. Mr. Shiv Shankar and Ms. Pragya Verma, Advs. for Mr. Yogesh Saini. Mr. Gulshan Kumar Sachdev and Ms. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/09/2026 at 10:49:53 Aayushi Singh, Advs. for HDFC Bank. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL O R D E R % 17.09.2026 W.P.(C) 10932/2026 1. Mr. Mukesh Kher, Advocate and petitioner in-person, appears. It is noted that on the previous date, as well as today, whenever the Court posed questions to him, he has consistently interjected and responded aggressively thereby making it impossible for the Court to deliberate upon the issues in question. We understand his anxiety, considering that he is personally appearing in the matter and the Court has confronted him with issue of gross suppression of facts, in the petition filed by him. 2. The Court has suggested to Mr. Mukesh Kher that he be represented by another lawyer on the next date in order that somebody can present his version calmly and with clarity. 3. In the meanwhile, Mr. Kher will file a reply to CM APPL. 60940/2026 and CM APPL. 61989/2026, which have been filed for intervention in the matter by one, Yogesh Saini and HDFC Bank, respectively. 4. A serious issue has been raised by them in these intervention applications. They have placed on record various facts and circumstances and documents to show inter alia an order, which was passed on 25th May 2026 by the District Judge in Misc. DJ 19/26, for maintaining status quo with respect to possession, title, operation, management and assets, including, medical equipment situated at property bearing no. H-10, Green Park Extension, New Delhi (hereinafter, ‘subject property’), the suit filed by Mr. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/09/2026 at 10:49:53 Mukesh Kher (plaintiff therein), against Panacea Institute of Radiology & Medical Services Pvt. Ltd. (hereinafter, ‘Company’). These and other surrounding facts were not mentioned in then petition. 5. Mr. Kher seeks to file a response and place relevant documents on record to satisfy the Court that he was not guilty of gross suppression in filing this petition. He may do so within 4 weeks. 6. As regards the order passed by this Court on 04th August 2026, Mr. Piyush Beriwal, counsel for respondents, states that they had inspected the property on 10th August 2026. A detailed order was passed on 16th September 2026 penalising the Company, as well as, two directors- Mr. Nitin Chopra and Mr. Prashant Sarin for an amount of Rs.1,00,000/- each for default under Section 12(8) of Companies Act, 2013 for not having a functional registered office on the address provided and not updating the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (‘MCA’) Registry, if the registered office had changed. 7. List on 27th November 2026. CONT.CAS(C) 1653/2026 1. In view of the response and action taken by respondents, MCA and Registrar of Companies (‘ROC’), the contempt petition does not need to subsist and is therefore dismissed. 2. Pending applications, if any, are rendered infructuous. 3. Order be uploaded on the website of this Court. ANISH DAYAL, J SEPTEMBER 17, 2026/MK/sp This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/09/2026 at 10:49:53