251.19CP 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 908 CONTEMPT PETITION NO.251 OF 2019 IN WRIT PETITION NO.539 OF 2017 BHAUSAHEB SAKHARAM NAVTHAR VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTHERS ... AGP for respondent-State : Mr.N.B.Patil ... CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE & VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV,JJ. DATE : 07.10.2026 P.C. : 1] None for the petitioner. However, the learned AGP by pointing out affidavit-in-reply submits that the order under contempt is already complied with by granting pensionary benefits to the petitioner and also regular pension. 2] In view of the same, nothing survives in this petition and the same stands disposed of. [VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV] [SANDIPKUMAR C.MORE] JUDGE JUDGE DDC 2026:BHC-AUG:47742-DB