[2026:RJ-JP:130] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16593/2025 1. Managing Committee Gandhi Mahila Mahavidyalaya, Shirdi Sai Baba Mandir Parisar, Kishangarh Renwal, District Jaipur Through Its Secretary Kailash Kumar Bidsar S/o Govind Ram Bidsar, Age About 54 Years, R/o 41 Alpana Colony, Khatipura Road, Jhotwara, Jaipur. 2. Principal, Gandhi Mahavidyalaya, Shirdi Sai Baba Mandir Parisar, Kishangarh Renwal, District Jaipur Through Its Secretary. ----Petitioners Versus 1. Ram Kishor Swami S/o Shri Satya Narayan Swami, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Mangara Ki Dhani, Tala, Jaipur, Rajasthan. (Application No. 145/2009). 2. Commissioner, College Education, Rajasthan, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Om Prakash Sharma For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 06/01/2026 1. By way of present petition, the order dated 07.07.2025 (Annexure-1) is put to challenge, the relevant portion of the order, whereby part prayer of the respondent is allowed has been reproduced as under: " ्ቚाቕኍगण का ्ቚाቕኍना प्ቔ वि रू्ቍ अ्ቒाቕኍगण आंविक रूप से ्ቭीकार विकया जाकर अ्ቚाቕኍगण को आदे विदया जाता है विक अ्ቚाቕኍगण , ्ቚाቕኍगण को अ्ሴू बर 2008 से अ्ቚाቕኍ सं्ቝा में रहने तक राजकीय महावि ्ቕालयों के वि्ቌकों के बराबर बकाया ेतन , महंगाई भ्ቈा , मकान विकराया भ्ቈा , हरी ्ቌवितपूवित भ्ቈा , ावि-क ेतन ृቍኌ्ቍ का ्ቚाቕኍगण का ेतन ቍኌ्ቝरीकरण करने के प्ቐात् बकाया रावि मय ्ቚाቕኍना प्ቔ ्ቚ्ቜुत करने की विदनांक से ता सूली 06 ्ቚवितत ावि-क ्ቛाज सविहत भुगतान करे। [2026:RJ-JP:130] (2 of 3) [CW-16593/2025] अ्ቚाቕኍगण ्ቛारा ्ቚाቕኍगण को उपरो्ሹ अनुतो-ों के स्ቚ्቏ में यविद कोई भुगतान विकया गया हो तो उ्ሹ भुगतान की गयी रावि समायोजन यो्ቆ होगी। ्ቚाቕኍगण ्ቛारा चाहे गये अ्቗ अनुतो- अ्ቭीकार विकये जाते हैं।” (emphasis supplied) 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that as per the order dated 29.07.2011 (Point No.4, Annexure-3), there exists no liability qua the remaining dues of the respondent on the petitioner-institute. It is further submitted that as per the order dated 08.10.2013 and 24.06.2008 (Annexure-4 and Annexure-5), recognition qua the petitioner-institute has already been withdrawn by the State and in light of the same, liability fixed upon the petitioner-institute to pay the remaining dues vide the impugned order 07.07.2025 is not tenable. 3. This Court has analyzed the impugned order dated 07.07.2025 and the relevant portion in this regard has been reproduced below: “(11) अ्ቚाቕኍ सं्ቅा 01 सं्ቝा अनुदाविनत सं्ቅा है । इस त्ቔ के स्ቚ्቏ में अ्ቚाቕኍगण ने कोई वि ाद नहीं विकया है तቕኍा ्ቚाቕኍगण के अनुसार -, 2011 में े राजकीय से ा में राज्ቝान ्ቇामीण वि्ቌा से ा विनयम, 2010 के अ्ቌगत समायोविजत हो चुके है इस सं्ቚ्቏ में भी अ्ቚाቕኍगण ने कोई वि ाद नहीं विकया है। ्ቚाቕኍगण के अनुसार अ्ቚाቕኍगण ने ्ቚाቕኍगण को राजकीय महावि ्ቕालय के वि्ቌकों के समान अविDविनयम , 1989 की Dारा 29 विनयम , 1993 के विनयम 34 के अनुसार अ्ሴू बर , 2008 से ेतन , महंगाई भ्ቈा , मकान विकराया भ्ቈा , हरी ्ቌवितपूवित भ्ቈा नहीं विदयो है तቕኍा ेतन तቕኍा ेतन ृቍኌ्ቍ का लाभ नहीं देना मनमाना वि विD वि रू्ቍ होकर सामने आता है।” (emphasis supplied) Upon perusal of the said impugned order, this Court has observed that the learned Tribunal while considering various prayers made by the respondents has only allowed payment of the remaining dues as per the prayer made in terms of para-11 as same are the statutory rights of the respondent as per the [2026:RJ-JP:130] (3 of 3) [CW-16593/2025] provisions enshrined under Section 29 of the Rajasthan Non- Government Educational Institutions Act, 1989 read with Rule 34 of the Rajasthan Non-Government Educational Institutions (Recognition, Grant-In-Aid and Service Conditions Etc.) Rules, 1993. 4. It has further been observed that while allowing the prayer of the respondent-applicant not only the statutory provisions were considered but the learned Tribunal analyzed the fact that the petitioner institution has already been absorbed/adjusted under the State in terms of Rajasthan Voluntary Rural Education Service Rules, 2010 with effect from the specific term (2011) and the same has not been disputed therein. 5. Considering the material available on record and relying upon the findings on the fact of recognition/de-recognition, as dealt by the learned Tribunal in para 11 of the impugned order, this Court is of view that if there exists any prior liabilities/remaining dues in terms of Section 29 of the Rajasthan Non-Government Educational Institutions Act, 1989 read with Rule 34 of the Rajasthan Non-Government Educational Institutions (Recognition, Grant-In-Aid and Service Conditions Etc.) Rules, 1993, the same shall be borne by the petitioner-institute. 6. In light of the above, the present writ petition is dismissed. Pending applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J DEEPAK /33