- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26513-DB CCC No. 1132 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 1132 OF 2025 BETWEEN: 1. SRI R. SACHIN S/O SMT. B.K. RATHNA AGED 33 YEARS R/AT NO.62/A, 5TH MAIN ROAD 2ND CROSS, PROMOD LAY-OUT BANGALORE - 560 039 …COMPLAINANT (BY SRI R.A. DEVANAND, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI T.S. RAMESH S/O LATE SETHURAMA RAO AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS R/AT NO.7/14, POLICE STATION ROAD BASAVANAGUDI BENGALURU - 560 004 SRI RAGHAVENDRA RAO 2. SRI RAGHAVENDRA RAO S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE COMPLAINANT AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS BY ITS PROPRIETOR M/S NIRMANA VENTURES BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS NO.49/3, WEST ANJANEYA TEMPLE STREET Digitally signed by VEERENDRA KUMAR K M Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26513-DB CCC No. 1132 of 2025 BASAVANAGUDI BENGALURU - 560 004 …ACCUSED THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 22 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971, PRAYING TO INITIATE CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE ACCUSED NO.1 AND 2 AND CONDUCT TRIAL BY CONVICTING THE ACCUSED NO.1 AND 2 FOR HAVING DISOBEYED THE ORDER PASSED IN MFA NO.08/2010 DATED 23.09.2014, AND WHICH IS PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-A, BY ALLOWING THIS CONTEMPT PETITION IN ENTIRETY & ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE and HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE) 1. For the reasons stated in the application - I.A.No.1/2025, the same is allowed. Order dated 05.11.2025 is recalled. 2. The complainant has filed the present complaint alleging willful disobedience of the order dated 23.09.2014 passed by this Court in MFA No.8/2010 (FC-DB). 3. The said appeal was disposed of in terms of a settlement arrived at between the parties, who were the parents of the - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26513-DB CCC No. 1132 of 2025 complainant. The said order records that the complainant's father (Sri.T.S.Ramesh) had agreed to give the complainant 12.50% of his shares in the joint family property bearing No.6/13, Police Station road, Basavanagudi, Bengaluru, and treat it as an integral part of the joint development agreement. The complainant claims that despite the said order, his father has declined to assign the 12.50% share in his favour. 4. The complainant was not a party to the said proceedings (MFA No8/2010). However, he claims his rights pursuant to the settlement arrived at between his parents. We do not consider it apposite to entertain any proceedings under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. The complainant is, however, not precluded from enforcing his claims in accordance with law. The complaint is, accordingly, dismissed. Sd/- (VIBHU BAKHRU) CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- (K.S. HEMALEKHA) JUDGE KMV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 31