KRISHAN KUMAR SHARMA S/O JAMUNA PRASAD v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/14022/2025 · 2026-01-08
Ganesh Ram Meena
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19295 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19295 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:481] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14022/2025
1. Krishan Kumar Sharma S/o Jamuna Prasad, Aged About 40 Years, R/o House No. F-129, First Floor, Radha City Goverdhan Road, P.s. Highway, District Mathura (Up) At Present R/o Pandey Mohalla, P.S. Deeg, District Bharatpur (At Present Confined In Central Jail Ajmer).
2. Manoj Kumar S/o Balram Singh, Aged About 41 Years, R/o Village Malsarai, P.S. Goverdhan, District Mathura (UP) (At Present Confined In Central Jail Ajmer). ----Petitioners Versus The State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Devanshu Sharma, alongwith Ms. Vishalakshi Pareek For Respondent(s) : Ms. Aarti Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Order 08/01/2026
1. This bail application has been filed by the accused petitioners u/S 483 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 289/2025 registered at Police Station Christianganj, District Ajmer for offences punishable u/S 318(4), & 61(2)(a) BNS.
2.
Learned counsel for the accused petitioner submits that offences alleged against the accused petitioners are triable by Magistrate and after conclusion of the investigation, the police has submitted charge-sheet in the matter. He also submits that the accused petitioners are in custody since 10.10.2025.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the bail application.
[2026:RJ-JP:481] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-14022/2025]
4. Having regard to the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused petitioners and taking into consideration the allegations against them as the offences alleged against them are triable by Magistrate and after completion of investigation, the police has submitted charge-sheet in the matter and the accused petitioners are in custody since 10.10.2025, this Court, without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioner on bail.
5. Accordingly, this bail application is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided that they furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only) each, together with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only)(each) to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court or any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
6. It has been brought to the notice of this Court that such type of accused persons of particular areas, who are found to be involved in the online fraud, after their release from a criminal case, celebrate their release in public, hence, taking into
consideration the aforesaid aspect, a condition is stipulated that the accused-petitioner shall not celebrate their release in public, and if they are found to be involved in celebrating their release in public, the State shall be at liberty to move the application for cancellation of their bail.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J Gaurav Srivastava /82