Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19294 (CHH)

MANOJ VISHWAKARMA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/6038/2023 · 2026-05-04

Shri Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:21033 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6038 of 2023 Manoj Vishwakarma S/o- Shri Narmada Prasad Vishwakarma Aged About 44 Years Presently Working As Peon At District Legal Aid Services Authority, Kabirdham, Dis- trict : Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Secretary, Department Of Law And Justice, Ma- hanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Member Secretary, Chhattisgarh State Legal Aid Sevices Authority, Old High Court Building Campus, District : Bilaspur, Chhattis- garh 3 - The District Legal Aid Services Authority Through Its President / District Judge, District Legal Aid Services Authority, Kabirdham, District : Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Akath Kumar Yadav, Adv. For Respondents No. 1 and 2 : Ms. Anuradha Jain, PL For Respondent No. 3 : Mr. Ashish Tiwari, Adv. Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi Order On Board 5-5-2026 1. The petitioner has preferred this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking following reliefs :- “10.1 To call for the records of the case for the kind perusal of this Hon'ble Court. 10.2 To issue an appropriate writ or order and direct the respondent no.3 to consider the grievance of the petitioner for payment of two increments. AVANISH KUMAR PATHAK Digitally signed by AVANISH KUMAR PATHAK Date: 2026.05.08 14:55:00 +0530 2 10.3 To issue an appropriate writ or order to give back wages from the date of termination to reinstatement in service till date. 10.4 That this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent no.3 in respect of stoppage of two increments be considered as dias-non. 10.5 Any other relief deemed fit in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be granted.” 2. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of the Court to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to challenge the order (Annexure P-1) dated 31-1-2023 passed by the Chairman, District Legal Services Authority, Kabirdham (Kawardha) (CG) before appropriate forum. 3. Learned counsel for the State has no objection to allow above prayer. 4. On due consideration, the petitioner is permitted to withdraw this writ petition with the liberty as sought for. 5. This writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as sought for. 6. Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, stands disposed of. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge pathak