Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19291 (BOM)

SUPRIYA RAJKUMAR BIRAJDAR v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLN/4091/2025 · 2026-10-12

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 / 2 34-APPLN-4091-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 34 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4091 OF 2025 Supriya Rajkumar Birajdar VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Another ….. Mr. Maniyar Irfan D, Advocate for Applicant. Mrs. B. B. Gunjal, APP for Respondent – State. Ms. Nita Deosarkar h/f., Mr. V. S. Kakde, Advocate for Respondent No.2. ….. CORAM : SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J. DATE : 12 OCTOBER, 2026 PC: 1. The applicant is seeking quashing and setting aside of the First Information Report No.308 of 2023 and the consequently charge-sheet dated 26 December 2024, along with the criminal proceedings arising therefrom, registered under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code at Jafrabad Police Station, District Jalna. 2. During the pendency of the instant Criminal Application, the parties have amicably settled their dispute with a view to putting an end to the matter. Accordingly, they were directed to remain present before the Registrar (Judicial). The Registrar (Judicial), vide its report dated 8 September 2026, has submitted a report confirming the execution of the compromise terms. The aforesaid report also signed by the parties. Kiran Kawre 2026:BHC-AUG:48658-DB 2 / 2 34-APPLN-4091-2025 3. In view of the aforesaid compromise between the parties, the instant Criminal Application is allowed. First Information Report No.308 of 2023, the consequential charge-sheet dated 26 December 2024, and the criminal proceedings arising therefrom are quashed and set aside. (SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.) Kiran Kawre