HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Writ Miscellaneous Application No.449/2025 In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1482/2025 1. Muktilal Son Of Shri Harinarain, Resident Of Tenant Amba Hair Dresser, Near Jain Temple, Durgapura Main Road, Jaipur (Raj.) (Died During Pendency Of Appeal). 1/1. Gopal Lal Sain Son Of Late Muktilal, Resident Of Near Durga Mata Mandir, Rano Ka Mohalla, Durgapura, Jaipur. 1/2. Vimla Devi Wife Of Late Muktilal, Resident Of Near Durga Mata Mandir, Rano Ka Mohalla, Durgapura, Jaipur. ----Petitioners Versus 1. Badrinrain Son Of Shri Kalyan Bux, Resident Of Katta Bhawan, Durgapura, Tonk Road, Jaipur (Died During Application). 1/1. Smt. Kanta Devi Wife Of Late Shri Badrinarain, Resident Of Katta Bhawan, Durgapura, Tonk Road, Jaipur, Raj. 1/2. Suresh Khatta @ Guddu Son Of Late Shri Badrinarain, Resident Of Katta Bhawan, Durgapura, Tonk Road, Jaipur, Raj. 1/3. Rajesh Khatta Son Of Late Shri Badrinarain, Resident Of Katta Bhawan, Durgapura, Tonk Road, Jaipur, Raj. 1/4. Dinesh Khatta Son Of Late Shri Badrinarain, Resident Of Katta Bhawan, Durgapura, Tonk Road, Jaipur, Raj. 2. Pushpa Devi Daughter Of Late Muktilal Wife Of Shri Sanwarmal, Resident Of Mohalla Pandika, Mehroli, Distt. Sikar. 3. Smt Sonu Daughter Of Late Muktilal Wife Of Shri Rajesh, Resident Of Plot No. 17, Ganesh Bagh, Behind Mayur Hospital, Khajrana Indore. 4. Santosh Daughter Of Late Muktilal Wife Of Shri Gajanand, Resident Of 855, Ravdhir Singh Colony, Manoharpur, Jaipur. 5. Rekha Daughter Of Late Muktilal Wife Of Shri Shambhudayal, Resident Of 456, Shubham Vihar, Agra Road, Luniawas, Jaipur. (2 of 2) [WMAP-449/2025] 6. Sunita Daughter Of Late Muktilal Wife Of Shri Rakesh Kumar, Resident Of Jamwaramgarh, Mohalla Bada Bas, Bhanpura Kalan, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Agarwal for Ms. Anita Khandelwal JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 05/02/2026 1. The matter comes up on misc. application No.449/2025 seeking correction/modification of the order dated 19.09.2025 passed by this Court while deciding S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1482/2025. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents-applicants submits that in last line of Para 5 (1) of the order dated 19.09.2025, the date 25.10.2026 has been inadvertently typed out as 25.10.2016. Learned counsel submits that for the aforesaid correction, the instant application has been preferred. 3. After perusing the application and going through the order dated 19.09.2025, this Court is satisfied that the date 25.10.2026 has been wrongly typed out as 25.10.2016. Accordingly, the misc. application stands allowed and it is ordered that the date “25.10.2016” appearing in the last line of the Para 5(1) of the order dated 19.09.2025 be read as “25.10.2026”. 4. This order shall be treated as part and parcel of the order dated 19.09.2025. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Karan/77