Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1928 (JHR)

SARTEJ SANGAREJ ALIAS MD. SARRAJ RANGREJ v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./9939/2025 · 2026-01-09

Deepak Roshan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:725 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 9939 of 2025 --------- Sartaj Sangrej @ Md. Sartaj Rangrej, aged about 20 years, son of Salim Sangrej, resident of Village Mahuaara, P.O. & P.S. Thakurgangti, District- Godda, Jharkhand. ..… Petitioner(s) Versus The State of Jharkhand ..... Opposite Party(s) --------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --------- For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. A.P.Deo, Advocate For the Opposite Party(s) : Mr. Bishambhar Shastri, APP --------- 04/09.01.2026 Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The instant bail application has been preferred by the petitioner for grant of regular bail in connection with Balbadda, P.S. Case No. 35 of 2025, (S.T. No. 318 of 2025), for the offences registered under Sections 87 and 351 (3) of B.N.S. 2023, pending in the Court of learned District and Additional Sessions Judge-II at Godda. 3. Learned APP submits that as per his instruction through letter dated 07.01.2026, four prosecution witnesses have been examined till 07.01.2026 and rest two witnesses will be examined on 28.01.2026. 4. Having regard to the aforesaid facts it is clear that the learned trial court is in seisin in this case. Accordingly, no relief can be granted to the petitioner at this stage. It is expected that the trail court will conclude the trial within a period of three months. (Deepak Roshan, J.) 09.01.2026 Amardeep/ Uploaded 13/01/2026