- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25572 WP No. 37730 of 2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.37730 OF 2012 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN: 1. M/S BIRGADE RESORTS AND HOTELS NO.105,MAGADI ROAD, VIJAYANAGAR, BENGALURU -560079, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, SRI. Y.R. MANOHAR. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. C.S. PRASANNA KUMAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI. HARISH KUMAR OBEROI S/O LATE O P OBEROI, AGED: MAJOR RESIDING AT NO.1317, BINNAMANGALA DOUBLE ROAD, II STAGE INDIRA NAGAR, BENGALURU -560 038. 2. SMT. ANJU OBEROI W/O HARISH KUMAR OBEROI, AGED: MAJOR RESIDING AT NO.1317, BINNAMANGALA DOUBLE ROAD, II STAGE INDIRA NAGAR, Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25572 WP No. 37730 of 2012 BENGALURU -560 038. 3. SRI. C. RAMA REDDY S/O LATE PAPAIAH AGED : MAJOR RESIDING AT NO.17, CHALGHATTA VILLAGE, YAMALUR POST, BENGALURU -560 037. 4. SPECIAL TAHSILDAR BANGALORE EAST TALUK, BENGALURU - 560 078. 5. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BANGALORE NORTH, BENGALURU - 560 022. 6. DEPUTY COMISSIONER BANGALORE DISTRICT, BENGALURU - 560 009. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. CHANDAN, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2; SMT. B.P. RADHA, AGA FOR R4 TO R6; R3 SERVED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT TO CONTEDING THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER IN REV.PET.NO.118/09-10 DATED 11.06.2012, VIDE ANNEXURE-E. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25572 WP No. 37730 of 2012 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER 1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2. In this Writ Petition, petitioner is assailing the order dated 11.06.2012 in Revn.Petn. No.118/2009-10(Annexure-E). 3. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties, I have carefully examined the impugned order at Annexures - E and F, wherein, the respondent - authorities have taken note of the factual aspects on record that contesting respondent herein had purchased the land in question by way of registered Sale Deed much earlier to the petitioner is concerned. It is also brought to the notice of the Court by Sri. Chandan, learned counsel for respondent Nos.1 and 2 that suit in O.S. No.15942/2006 on the file of LXXIII City Civil and Sessions Judge, Mayo Hall Unit, Bengaluru, has been decreed in part, vide Judgment and Decree dated 30.03.2023. In that view of the matter, I am of the view that, no interference is called for in this Writ Petition. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25572 WP No. 37730 of 2012 4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as the rights of the parties has already been crystallised in O.S.No.15942/2006, by the Trial Court. 5. Consequently, the pending I.A.1/2023 does not survive for consideration. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE sac List No.: 1 Sl No.: 20