Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19277 (CHH)

LUKESH KUMBHAKAR v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/9528/2023 · 2026-05-10

Shri Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:22137 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 9528 of 2023 Lukesh Kumbhakar S/o Shri Ram Gopal Kumbhakar, Aged About 32 Years R/o Q. No. 301, Sector-3, Type -A, Balco Nagar, Korba, District Korba Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Employment And Training Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nava Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Director, Directorate Of Employment And Training Department Indrawati Bhawan, Block-4, First Floor, Nava Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) With WPS No. 4478 of 2024 Deepak Kumar Xaxa S/o Shri Julius Xaxa Aged About 41 Years R/o New Karan Nagar, Changorbhata Near Om Furniture Ward No. 67, Post Office Sundar Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Employment And Training Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nava Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Director, Directorate Of Employment And Training Department Indrawati Bhawan, Block-4, First Floor, Nava Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) (cause title downloaded from CIS Periphery) For Petitioner : Ms. Apporva Pandey, Adv on behalf of Mr. Ghanshyam Kashyap, Advocate. Digitally signed by AJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI DN: cn=AJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI, ou=HIGH COURT, o=HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, st=Chhattisgarh, c=IN 2 For State : Mr. Dilman Rati Minj, Dy. AG. (Hon’ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi ) Order on Board 11/05/2026 1. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that grievance of the petitioners have been redressed and matter is become infructuous, therefore, they does not want to pursue the case further and seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the same. 2. Learned State counsel has no objection to above submission. 3. Having regard to above submission, both the writ petitions are disposed of as withdrawn. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge Ajay