[2026:RJ-JP:4674] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16814/2025 Jitendra Sharma Son of Shri Banwari Lal Sharma, aged about 33 years, Resident of Shyamsinghpura, Dausa, at present resident of 26, Radha Govind Vihar, Sumel Road, Jamdoli, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan through its Principal Secretary, Department of Autonmous, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. Director, Department of Local Bodies, G-3, Rajmahal Residency Area Scheme, Near Civil Line Fatak, Jaipur-16. 3. Treasurer, C.M.R. and Financial Advisor, CMAR city managers Association of Rajasthan, Swayatt Shasan Bhawan, Civil Line Phatak Jaipur (Raj.). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anil Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 02/02/2026 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with following prayers:- "It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that your lordship may graciously be pleased to accept and allow this Writ petition and call for the entire record relating to the case and after examine the same - i Quash and set aside the impugned order dated 11.09.2025 (Annexure-5) passed by the respondent whereby the services of the petitioner have been terminated. ii. Direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner in service forthwith with continuity of [2026:RJ-JP:4674] (2 of 3) [CW-16814/2025] service and full back wages along with all consequential benefits arising therefrom. iii. Declare that the petitioner is entitled to continue in service as Multi-Task Worker under the respondent-CMAR with regular pay and service benefits as admissible under law. (iv). Issue any other writ order or direction, which this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper, may kindly be passed in favour of the petitioner." 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since 2010, the petitioner has been working as Computer Operator through placement agency, however, in the year 2022, the designation of the post was changed as Multi-Task Worker. Learned counsel submits that although he was working through placement agency, yet he was rendering services in respondent- Department without any break, however, vide order dated 11.09.2025 without assigning any reason or without issuing notice, his services have been terminated. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner admits that no specific appointment order was although issued, yet in the note- sheets prepared by the Department, there is reference of engaging the petitioner through placement agency against honorarium of Rs.15,000/- per month, which was also increased vide order dated 10.01.2023. 4. However, learned counsel for the petitioner has utterly failed to point out his statutory or constitutional rights to hold the post, or to continue through placement agency. In the instant case, letter dated 11.09.2025 has also been addressed to the placement agency M/s Himadri Computers, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur, which reveals that the services of Multi-Task Worker through placement agency have been terminated. [2026:RJ-JP:4674] (3 of 3) [CW-16814/2025] 5. On specific query, learned counsel has submitted that no other person has been appointed as Multi-Task Worker after terminating services of the petitioner by the respondent- Department. 6. In view of above, there is no scope of interference under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Hence, the writ petition filed by the petitioner, is hereby dismissed. 7. Pending application(s), if any, also stand(s), disposed of. (ANAND SHARMA),J DIVYA /11