Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19269 (BOM)

VINOD PREMSING CHAVAN v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS

WP/9747/2022 · 2026-10-07

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Sr. Nos.8, 15, 35 & 36.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 8 WRIT PETITION NO. 12775 OF 2026 Radhika Dipak Ahire And Another VERSUS The State of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary And Others ... Mr. Sanjay R. Kolhare, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. K. N. Lokhande, AGP for the Respondent-State. Mr. Anup R. Nikam, Advocate for Respondent No.4. … AND 15 WRIT PETITION NO. 11696 OF 2022 Iram Afreen Abdul Samad VERSUS The State of Maharashtra Through Its Principal Secretary And Others ... Mr. Irfan D. Maniyar, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. N. S. Tekale, AGP for the Respondent-State. Mr. Anup R. Nikam, Advocate for Respondent No.2. Mr. N. S. Kadam, Advocate for Respondent No.4. Ms. Yogita S. Thorat, Advocate for Respondent No.5. ... AND 35 WRIT PETITION NO. 9747 OF 2022 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3671 OF 2026 IN WP/9747/2022 Vinod Premsing Chavan VERSUS The State of Maharashtra Through Its Principal Secretary And Others ... Mr. Irfan D. Maniyar, Advocate for the Petitioner-Applicant. Mr. N. S. Tekale, AGP for the Respondent-State. Mr. Anup R. Nikam, Advocate for Respondent No.2. … Sayyed 1/2 2026:BHC-AUG:47517-DB Sr. Nos.8, 15, 35 & 36.doc AND 36 WRIT PETITION NO. 10672 OF 2022 Shrinivas Kishanrao Patil VERSUS The State of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary And Others ... Mr. Irfan D. Maniyar, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. P. K. Lakhotiya, AGP for the Respondent-State. Mr. Anup R. Nikam, Advocate for Respondent No.3. Ms. Yogita Thorat, Advocate for Respondent No.5. ... CORAM : KISHORE C. SANT & JITENDRA JAIN, JJ. DATE : 7th OCTOBER, 2026 PER COURT : 1. Heard learned advocate for the petitioner. 2. The learned advocate for the petitioner informs that the case is covered by the judgment passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.9430 of 2022 and other connected matters. 3. Considering above, these petitions can be conveniently disposed of without notice to the respondents. Petitions stand disposed of in terms of the judgment and order dated 30.09.2026 in Writ Petition No.9430 of 2022. 4. In view of disposal of the petitions, pending civil applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (JITENDRA JAIN, J.) (KISHORE C. SANT, J.) Sayyed 2/2