APHC010145782026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] WEDNESDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 8268/2026 Between: 1. P. LALITHA KUMARI, W/O P. VENKATA NARAYANA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/ O REDDYGARIPALLI VILLAGE, KALIKIRI MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. (522238) 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT AT RAYACHOTY. (516269) 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, MADANPALLE, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. (517325) 4. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, RAYACHOTY, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. (516269) 5. THE TAHSILDAR, KALAKADA MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. (517326) 6. S VENKATARAMANA, S/O NARASIMHULU, AGE NOT KNOWN, OCC. NOT KNOWN, R/O PAPIREDDYGARIPALLE VILLAGE, KALADA MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. (517326) ...RESPONDENT(S): p. 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the inaction of the respondents herein particularly Respondent No.4 against the Petitioners representation through PGRS vide Application No. ANMY20250804998, Dt. 04.08.2025 for surveying, fixing boundaries and issuance of Pattadar Passbooks to the petitioners land to an extent of Ac. 3.50 cents in Sy.No.1215/2 of Yerrakotapalle Village, Kalakada Mandal, Annamayya District except issuing notice vide Ref.No. PGRS-F/1384/2025, Dt. 17.10.2025 to the petitioner and the Respondent No.6 to attend the enquiry despite lapse of two years of time as nothing but illegal, arbitrary, highhanded and violative of Principles of Natural Justice and violative of Articles 21 and 300-A of The Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondent No.4 to consider the petitioners representation, Dt. 04.08.2025 for surveying, fixing boundaries and for issuance of Pattadar passbooks pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.4 to consider the petitioner’s representation, Dt. 04.08.2025 for surveying, fixing boundaries and for issuance of Pattadar passbooks with regard to the subject property to an extent of Ac. 3.50 cents in in Sy.No.1215/2 of Yerrakotapalle Village, Kalakada Mandal, Annamayya District by granting Pattadar Passbooks and title deeds to the petitioner, pending disposal of the Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SURESH KUMAR REDDY KALAVA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following order : Heard Sri Anand Surya, learned counsel representing Sri Suresh Kumar Reddy Kalava, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Divya Teja, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, for respondents 1 to 5. Page 3 of 4 2. Notice to respondent No.5 is dispensed with since no adverse order affecting his rights or interest, is passed. 3. The above writ petition was filed to declare the action of the respondents in taking further steps in the appeal made by the petitioner for conducting survey, fixing boundaries and issuance of pattadar pass books and title deeds in respect of Ac.3-50 cents in survey No.1215/2, Yerrakotapalle Village, Kalakada Mandal, Annamayya District, pursuant to the notice issued by respondent No.4 vide PGRS F /1384/2025 dated 17.10.2025, as illegal and arbitrary. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner made a complaint to respondent No.4 through PGRS vide application No.ANMY20250804998 dated 04.08.2025 to conduct a survey, fix boundaries and for issuance of pattadar passbook and title deed in respect of the aforementioned property. The Tahsildar issued an endorsement vide ROC No.102/2025 dated 07.10.2025 (Ex.P2). Aggrieved by the said endorsement, the petitioner filed an appeal on the file of respondent No.4. The office of respondent No.4 issued notice vide PGRS F /1384/2025 dated 17.10.2025 (Ex.P3). However, the appeal has not been disposed of so far. 5. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue submitted a copy of the endorsement issued by respondent No.4 vide Ref.No.F/1384/2025 dated 22.11.2025. 6. A copy of the endorsement is handed over to the learned counsel for the petitioner across the bar. 7. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that liberty may be granted to the petitioner to challenge the endorsement dated 22.11.2025. p. 4 8. Given the endorsement, dated 22.11.2025, passed by respondent No.4, pursuant to Ex.P3, notice, in the appeal filed by the petitioner, the grievance of the petitioner is misconceived, and thus, this Court does not find any merit in the writ petition. Therefore, this writ petition is liable to be dismissed and accordingly dismissed. 9. However, this order will not preclude the petitioner from challenging the endorsement Ref.No.F/1384/2025 dated 22.11.2025 issued by respondent No.4, before the appropriate authority in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 01.04.2026 IKN