ZAFAR IQBAL AND OTHERS v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CWP/16308/2026 · 2026-05-22
Namit Kumar
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19265 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19265 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CWP-16308-2026 (O&M) IN THE H
Zafar Iqbal & State of Punjab
CORAM:
Present:
NAMIT KUM
1.
Articles 226/2 directing the extending them titled as ‘Sau decided on 13 matters, with interest @ 12% of actual paym
2.
their grievanc 12.03.2026
consideration. satisfied, if ap &M) (1)
THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB A CHANDIGARH
bal & others
Versus Punjab & others
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAM
Mr. Rashpinder Singh Sohi, Advo KUMAR, J. (Oral) The present petition has been f 226/227 of the Constitution of India the respondents to consider the g them the benefit of judgment of th ‘Saurabh Sharma and others Vs. n 13.09.2024 (Annexure P-9) and fo with all consequential benefits as pe @ 12% per annum from the due date o l payments.
Learned counsel for the petitione ievances, the petitioners have also (Annexure P-8) to the respond ation. He further submits that at this s , if appropriate directions are issued t JAB AND HARYANA AT ARH CWP-16308-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 22.05.2026
...Petitioner/s
...Respondent/s NAMIT KUMAR , Advocate, for the petitioners. been filed by the petitioners under India, seeking a writ of mandamus r the claim of the petitioners for t of this Court in CWP-15896-2023 Vs. State of Punjab and others’ and followed in many other similar as per their entitlement along with date of their entitlement till the date titioners submits that for redressal of e also served legal notice dated spondents which is still pending t this stage, the petitioners would be ssued to the respondents to consider
nder amus for 23 rs’ milar with date al of ated ding ld be sider VIMAL KUMAR 2026.05.22 17:42 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.
CWP-16308-2026 (O&M) and decide th bound manner
3.
4.
of the respond by learned cou
5.
through the rec
6.
present petitio consider and d by the petition an opportunity months from t decision taken
22.05.2026 Vimal
&M) (2)
ide the said legal notice, by passing anner. Notice of motion. Mr. Charanpreet Singh, AAG, Pu spondents-State. He has no objection ed counsel for the petitioners. I have heard learned counsel the record of the case. Without going into the merits o petition is disposed of with a dire and decide legal notice dated 12.03.2 etitioners expeditiously, by passing a rtunity of hearing to the petitioners, pr from the date of receipt of certified c taken thereon shall be conveyed to the
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No
Whether reportable: Yes/No assing a speaking order, in a time G, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf ection to the innocuous prayer made for the parties and have gone erits of the case at this stage, the a direction to respondent No.4 to 2.03.2026 (Annexure P-8) submitted sing a speaking order after affording ers, preferably within a period of 04 ified copy of this order. Further, the d to the petitioners.
(NAMIT KUMAR)
JUDGE
time ehalf ade gone , the to itted rding 04 r, the VIMAL KUMAR 2026.05.22 17:42 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.