Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19264 (CHH)

SMT. AMASHIYA BAI v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/1437/2022 · 2026-05-07

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:21773 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1437 of 2022 1 - Smt. Amashiya Bai W/o Shri Pratap Singh, Aged About 48 Years Occupation-Sarpanch Gram Panchayat Semardarri, Tahseel Marwahi, District Gourela-Pendra-Marwahi (C.G.). ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Ministry Of Revenue, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Mantralay, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Ceo, Jila Panchayat (Drda), District Gourela-Pendra-Marwahi (C.G.) 3 - The Project Director, Jila Panchayat (Drda), District Gourela-Pendra- Marwahi (C.G.) 4 - The Officer, Janpad Panchayat Marwahi, District Gourela-Pendra- Marwahi (C.G.) 5 - District Collector, District Gourela-Pendra-Marwahi (C.G.) 6 - Sdo (Revenue) District Gourela-Pendra-Marwahi (C.G.) 7 - Nayab Tahsildar, Tahsil Marwahi, District Gourela-Pendra-Marwahi (C.G.) 8 - Smt. Mamta Pawle, Jila-Upadhyaksh, Mahila Congress Committee, District Gourela-Pendra-Marwahi (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Praveen Soni, Advocate For Respondent(s)/State : Mr. Abhishek Gupta, Panel Lawyer. For Respondent No. 4 : Mr. Dhiraj Kumar Wankhede, Advocate. RAGHVENDRA JAT Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 08/05/2026 1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- “10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for entire records, pertaining to case of Petitioner. 10.2 That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue writ/ writs, direction/directions to Respondent- Authorities to close the enquiry on Present Petitioner and they should jointly present an ideal example by taking concrete action against the Complainant (Respondent No. 8), so that such misuse does not recur again. 10.3 That the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other ancillary/relief, as it may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with the afflux of time, the petition has been rendered infructuous. 3. No objection has been raised from other side. 4. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat