RAMESH ANNASAHEB SUMBRE AND OTHERS v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
WP/4584/2019 · 2026-10-09
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19264 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19264 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
9-WP-4584-2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 4584 OF 2019 Ramesh Annasaheb Sumbre And Others VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Others … • Mr. A. G. Deshmukh, Advocate for the Petitioners • Mr. R. S. Wani, AGP for Respondents - State … CORAM : KISHORE C. SANT & JITENDRA JAIN, JJ. DATE : 09th OCTOBER, 2026 PER COURT :
1. Heard learned Advocate for the Petitioners and learned AGP for the Respondents – State.
2. The Petitioners have approached this Court challenging the communication dated 29.01.2018 issued by the Assistant Engineer, Grade-I, Sub-Division, Public Works Department, directing the Petitioners to remove the alleged encroachment on the road passing through Survey No. 63, failing which criminal action would be initiated against them.
3. It is the case of the Petitioners that, in fact, no such road exists at the site. The Petitioners have made representations dated 05.01.2018 and 01.02.2018 to the concerned authorities. However, the said representations have neither been considered nor has any response been given thereto. Jhs/ 1/2 2026:BHC-AUG:48550-DB
9-WP-4584-2019
4. Considering the limited grievance raised by the Petitioners, we find that the present Petition can be disposed of by directing the concerned authority to consider the representations dated 05.01.2018 and 01.02.2018, if not already considered, and take an appropriate decision thereon on their own merits and in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from today.
5. The Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of.
[JITENDRA JAIN, J.] [KISHORE C. SANT, J.] Jhs/ 2/2