Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1926 (UTT)

SHAKUNTALA RANA v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPMS/740/2026 · 2026-04-07

Pankaj Purohit

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

` SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPMS No.740 of 2026 Shakuntala Rana …………Petitioner Vs. State of Uttarakhand and others ……….Respondents Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Abhishek Anthwal, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Suyash Pant, learned S.C. for the State. 3. After arguing for a while, learned counsel for the petitioner made a statement at bar that he wants to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to file fresh petition, with better particulars. 4. Permission so sought is granted. 5. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 07.04.2026 SK