Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19259 (KAR)

SMT JAITUMBI v. SRI CHANDRAPPACHARI

RSA/2444/2017 · 2026-06-02

V Srishananda

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25804 RSA No. 2444 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 2444 OF 2017 (INJ) BETWEEN: 1. SMT JAITUMBI W/O SRI MOKBULLA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS RESIDENT AT R.S.DODDI VILLAGE HANUR HOBLI, KOLLEGAL TALUK CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT-571 313. …APPELLANT (MEMO FOR RETIREMENT FILED IN THE COURT ON 02.06.2026 BY SRI. DEVARAJ N., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI. CHANDRAPPACHARI S/O SIDDALINGACHARI AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS RESIDENT OF R.S. DODDI VILLAGE HANUR HOBLI, KOLLEGAL TALUK CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT-571313. 2. SRI. GURUSIDDACHARI S/O SIDDALINGACHARI AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS RESIDENT OF R S DODDI VILLAGE HANUR HOBLI, KOLLEGAL TALUK CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT-571313. 3. SRI. SIDDARAJU S/O GURUSIDDACHARI Digitally signed by CHAITHRA A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25804 RSA No. 2444 of 2017 AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS RESIDENT OF R S DODDI VILLAGE HANUR HOBLI, KOLLEGAL TALUK CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT-571313. 4. SRI. RACHAPPA S/O SIDDACHARI AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS RESIDENT AT R S DODDI VILLAGE HANUR HOBLI, KOLLEGAL TALUK CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT-571313. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. P.C. SUNITHA, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R4 [ABSENT]) THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 03.07.2017 PASSED IN RA NO.21/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KOLLEGAL, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 30.1.2016 PASSED IN OS NO.122/2010 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KOLLEGAL. TRIAL COURT DISMISSED THE SUIT. APPELLATE COURT DISMISSED THE APPEAL. THE SUIT FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo of retirement along with copy of the notice issued to the appellant, wherein it is noticed that the appellant said to have left the address. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25804 RSA No. 2444 of 2017 2. The said memo is accepted. 3. The present appeal arises out of the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.122/2010, wherein the suit for bare injunction came to be dismissed and the said judgment and decree was subsequently confirmed in the Regular Appeal filed in R.A.No.21/2016. 4. Since the appellant has not shown interest in prosecuting appeal further, the appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE NBM List No.: 2 Sl No.: 17