-1- 941-BA-1775-2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1775 OF 2026 SAGAR PUNAM KANDARE Versus THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ..... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Shaikh Nasimoddin Rafiyoddin APP for Respondent - State : Mr. S. A. Gaikwad ..... WITH BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1297 OF 2026 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3397 OF 2026 VISHAL VIJAY SAPKALE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ….. Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Avinash Patil h/f. Mr. A. K. Bhosle APP for Respondent - State : Mr. S. A. Gaikwad Advocate for Informant : Mr. H. P. Randhir ….. CORAM : HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J. DATED : 06th OCTOBER, 2026 PER COURT : 1. Heard learned Advocate for both the applicants and the learned APP for the State. 2. Learned APP submits that the trial has proceeded and three witnesses have already been examined. Learned Advocates for the applicants state that, though the witnesses have been examined, the trial has been stalled for a longer period and the applicants have been lingering in custody without trial. Tandale 2026:BHC-AUG:47447 -2- 941-BA-1775-2026 3. On the last occasion, this Court had directed the Trial Court to submit a report indicating within how much period the trial can be concluded. The report has been received from the Trial Court, stating that the trial can be concluded within six months from today. Learned Advocates for the applicants thus submit that, if the trial is not concluded, then they should be granted liberty to file a fresh application for bail. 4. Both applications are dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh applications in case the trial is not concluded within a period of eight months from today. 5. Criminal Application No.3397 of 2026 is also disposed of. (HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR) JUDGE Tandale