APHC010145252019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] THURSDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No: 6364/2019 Between: 1. KOTTE KRISHNAVENI, W/O LATE GOVINDIAH, HINDU AGED ABOUT 58, RESIDENT OF UPSTAIRS OF ANDHRAPRAGATHI GRAMEENA BANK, BRAHMAN STREET, MULAPET, NELLORE CITY. 2. CHENNURU ALIAS KOTTE SIVA PARVATHI,, W/O SRIKANTH, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, RESIDENT OF UPSTAIRS OFANDHRAPRAGATHIGRAMEENA BANK, BRAHMAN STREET, MULAPET, NELLORE CITY. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. STATE OF AP, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY HOME, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, , SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 3. THE DY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NELLORE TOWN, NELLORE DISTRICT. 4. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE AND SHO, POLICE STATION, IV TOWN, NELLORE. 5. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, IV TOWN POLICE STATIONNELLORE DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Counsel for the Petitioners: 1. PAVAN KUMAR PASUPULETI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.6364 OF 2019 ORDER: Heard Sri P.Pavan Kumar learned counsel for the writ petitioners and Sri R.Mallikarjuna Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 2. Sri R.Mallikarjuna Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home already submitted that there was no mis-conduct on the part of the respondents/police officials. They followed due procedure established by law. If the petitioners are aggrieved by the acts of the respondents/police officials, they have to approach the District Police Authority constituted for alternate remedy or if they aggrieved by the acts of the respondents/police officials on the ground of malicious prosecution, they have to approach proper civil forum for damages. The writ petition is not maintainable to decide complicated questions of law under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 3. Learned counsel for the writ petitioners would submit that in the light of above facts and circumstances, writ petition may be closed, without going into merits of the case, giving liberty to the writ petitioners to approach proper forum for necessary redressal in accordance with law. 4 4. In that view of the matter, the Writ Petition is closed at the stage of admission, without going into merits of the case, giving liberty to the writ petitioners to approach proper forum for necessary redressal in accordance with law, if they are aggrieved by the acts of the respondents/police officials. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 08.01.2026 PSK 5 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 38 WRIT PETITION No:6364 OF 2019 Date: 08.01.2026 W PSK