AASMOHAMMED S/O SHER MOHAMMED @ SHERU v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/13946/2025 · 2026-01-07
Pramil Kumar Mathur
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19251 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19251 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13946/2025 Aasmohammed S/o Sher Mohammed @ Sheru, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Beechka Baas Odra, Police Station Kishangarhbas, District Khairthal-Tijara (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Kishangarhbas). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Pp ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16431/2025 Shokin S/o Ashraf, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Bich Ka Bas Odra, Police Station Kishangarh Bas, District Khairthal-Tijara (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Kishangarh Bas). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sumer Singh Ola For Respondent(s) For Complainant : : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP with Mr. Naresh Kumar Gupta, PP Mr. Raunak Singhvi Mr. Anshuman Singh Champawat HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 07/01/2026
1. The petitioners have preferred these bail applications under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.321/2025 registered at Police Station Kishangarh Bas, District-Khairthal-Tijara for offences under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 303(2) and 351(2) of BNS.
(2 of 3) [CRLMB-13946/2025]
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant and perused the material available on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners and the complainant are neighbours and that the present incident arose out of a trivial dispute. He further submits that a cross-FIR has been lodged in the present matter, in which injuries were also inflicted upon the present petitioners. As per the FIR as well as the statements recorded during the course of investigation, there is no specific allegation against the present petitioners, nor is any overt act attributed to them. The specific act resulting in the injury described as dangerous to life has been attributed solely to the co-accused, Arshad. Petitioners are behind the bars since 01.10.2025. Charge-sheet has been filed. The trial of the cases may take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners in further custody, hence, the bail applications of the petitioners may be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail applications.
5. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case, and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners.
6. Accordingly, the bail applications under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioners-Aasmohammed S/o Sher Mohammed @ Sheru and Shokin S/o Ashraf shall
(3 of 3) [CRLMB-13946/2025] be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for their appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/82-83