2026:JHHC:19878 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 4991 of 2026 Pintu Kumar Das, son of Dilip Mahara … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Arvind Kr. Choudhary, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Subodh Kr. Dubey, APP --- 03/07.07.2026 Heard the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No. 56 of 2026, registered under Sections 111(2)(b), 111(3), 111(4), 318(4), 319(2), 338, 336(3), 340(2) and 61(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and sections 66(B), 66(C), 66(D) and 84(C) of Information Technology Act, now pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-Cum-Special Judge, Cyber Crime Cases, Deoghar. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner is in custody since 14.04.2026 and charge-sheet has been submitted. He submits that two mobile phones and two SIM cards are alleged to have been recovered from the possession of the petitioner and one victim is said to have been identified. However, in the case- diary, there are 15 crime links, but none of the mobile or the SIM Cards recovered from the petitioner has any crime link. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that the co- accused persons namely, Sawan Kumar Das and Chandan Kumar Das have been enlarged on bail by co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide orders dated 04.06.2026 in B.A. No. 4883 of 2026 and B.A. No. 4947 of 2026 respectively. 5. Learned counsel for the opposite party- State, on the other hand, has opposed the prayer for bail. 6. After hearing the learned counsels for the parties and considering the fact that charge-sheet has already been submitted and the fact that co-accused persons have been enlarged on bail vide 2026:JHHC:19878 2 orders dated 04.06.2026 in B.A. No. 4883 of 2026 and B.A. No. 4947 of 2026, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees twenty-five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-Cum-Special Judge, Cyber Crime Cases, Deoghar in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No. 56 of 2026, on the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of even single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned trial court. 7. The instant application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 8. Let this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through FAX/e- mail. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:07.07.2026 Pankaj Date of Uploading:08.07.2026