Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19242 (AP)

Smt.Cherlopalli Padma v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/6197/2018 · 2026-02-10

Sumathi Jagadam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010139552018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] WEDNESDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 6197/2018 Between: 1. SMT.CHERLOPALLI PADMA, W/O CHERLOPALLI DHARMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE, RESIDING AT 1-6- 665/A, INDIRA NAGAR, TIRUAPTI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPLE SECRETARY, (REVENUE) SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, RENIGUNTA, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 4th Respondent in interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of 2 JS,J W.P.No.6197 of 2018 petitioner over petitioner land situated in Sy.No. 536/1, R. Agraharam Village accounts, Renigunta Mandal, Chittoor District comprising of a) to an extent of 672 Sq.Yrds bounded East Road, West Vacant Land of S. Jaya Sankar, North Road and South Todays Gift Settlement Land b) to an extent of 625 Sq.Yrds bounded East Road, West Vacant Land of S. Krishnaiah, North Todays Gift Settlement Land and South Land of Ghani Sahab and in Sy.No. 559 7/A and 559 7/B Changareddy Village, Renigunta Mandal, Chittoor District to an extent of Ac. 0.43 cents, bounded East Cart Tract and Kamatam Chengaiah land, West petitioner land and others land, North Land of Ravi Kumar and others and South well and Kamatam Chengaiah land and threatening to demolish the Petitioner structures without following due process of law as illegal, arbitrary and violation of principles of natural justice besides violative of Articles 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 4th Respondent not to interfere with peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner over Writ Schedule Property and demolish the Petitioners structures without following due process of law and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 4th Respondent not to interfere and demolish the Petitioner structures without following due process of law, pending disposal of the main writ petition, in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. O UDAYA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) This Court made the following: 3 JS,J W.P.No.6197 of 2018 ORDER: Sri O. Udaya Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is accorded and the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM 11th February, 2026 cbs 4 JS,J W.P.No.6197 of 2018 THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION No.6197 of 2018 11th February, 2026 cbs