CRM-M-17911 IN THE H (130) LADI ALIAS R STATE OF PUN CORAM: HON Present: Mr. Ms. Mr. Adv **** MANISHA BAT 1. The Bharatiya Nagar FIR No.0011 da 125(b), 324(4) o Station City II M proceedings aris 27.02.2026 (Ann 2. This parties to appear the learned Magi of the compromis 7911-2026 (O&M) (1) HE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AN CHANDIGARH CRM Dat IAS RAMZAN MOHD Versus
F PUNJAB AND ANOTHER HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANI Mr. Mohd. Salim, Advocate for the Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Senior DAG Mr. Prakash Chand Shandil, Advoca Advocate for respondent No.2 ****
BATRA, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been fil Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (for short 11 dated 21.02.2025 registered und 4(4) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (fo y II Malerkotla, District Malerkotla al s arising therefrom, on the basi (Annexure P-2) arrived at between th This Court vide order dated 06.0 ppear before the trial Court to get the Magistrate was directed to send his r promise. AB AND HARYANA AT CRM-M-17911-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 20.05.2026 ... Petitioner
...Respondents MANISHA BATRA
or the petitioner or DAG, Punjab dvocate for Mr. Puneet Pali, en filed under Section 528 of short “BNSS”) for quashing of ed under Sections 281, 125(a), ita (for short “BNS”) at Police otla along with all consequential basis of compromise dated een the parties. 06.04.2026 had directed the get their statements recorded and d his report qua the genuineness AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.20 16:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-17911 3. Purs the learned Chie recorded. On the has submitted re has been effected or undue influenc 4. Lear have not disputed 5. In v continue with the 6. Foll judgment of this Punjab and ano Hon’ble Supreme (2012) 10 SCC 21.02.2025 regis Bharatiya Nyaya Malerkotla, Distr therefrom, on th are quashed qua t 20.05.2026 Amit Sharma 7911-2026 (O&M) (2) Pursuant to the aforesaid order, par Chief Judicial Magistrate, Malerkotl On the basis of the statements so rec tted report dated 15.05.2026 to the e ffected between the parties voluntarily fluence. Learned State counsel as well as co isputed the factum of compromise betw In view of the above, no useful pu ith the proceedings before the trial Co Following the principles laid do of this Court in Kulwinder Singh an another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) upreme Court in Gian Singh Versus S SCC 303, this petition is allowed registered under Sections 281, 1 Nyaya Sanhita (for short “BNS”) , District Malerkotla and the subseque on the basis of compromise dated 2 d qua the petitioner. (MA Whether speaking/reasoned:- Ye
  
er, parties have appeared before lerkotla and got their statements so recorded, learned Magistrate the effect that the compromise ntarily and without any coercion l as counsel for respondent No.2 se between the parties. ful purpose would be served to ial Court in the instant FIR. id down by the Full Bench h and others Versus State of nal) 1052 and approved by the sus State of Punjab and others lowed and FIR No.0011 dated 81, 125(a), 125(b), 324(4) of ) at Police Station City II bsequent proceedings emanating ated 27.02.2026 (Annexure P-2) (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No
AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.20 16:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.