Research › Search › Judgment
High Court of Rajasthan · body
2026 DAILYLAW 19235 (RAJ)
BANWARI LAL MEENA S/O LATE SHRI DHANNA RAM MEENA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/7193/2024 · 2026-02-17
Bhuwan Goyal
body2026
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19235 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19235 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:7444] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 7193/2024 Banwari Lal Meena S/o Late Shri Dhanna Ram Meena, Aged About 77 Years, R/o Plot No. 36, Mini Farm Residency Colony, Chhatarpur, New Delhi-110074. ----Complainant/Petitioner Versus
1. State of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. 2. Director General of Police, Police H.Q., Jaipur. 3. Commissioner of Police, Commissionerate of Police, Jaipur. 4. Dy. Commissioner of Police, Jaipur West, Jaipur. 5. Assistant Commissioner of Police, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gravit Saraswat, Adv. For Mr. Rajesh Goswami, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, Addl. GA Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Asst. GA Mr. Shubham Sain, AAAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL Order 17/02/2026
1. ;kph@ifjoknh dh vksj ls mDr ,dyihB vkijkf/kd fofo/k ;kfpdk varxZr /kkjk 528 Hkkjrh; ukxfjd lqj{kk lafgrk esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 797@2023] iqfyl Fkkuk& dj/kuh] ftyk& t;iqj¼if'pe½] vijk/k varxZr /kkjk 447] 467] 468] 471] 506] 120ch Hkkjrh; naM lafgrk o /kkjk 3¼1½¼f½] 3¼1½¼g½] 3¼1½¼r½] 3¼1½¼S½] 3¼2½¼v½] 3¼2½¼va½ vuqlwfpr tkfr ,oa vuqlwfpr tutkfr¼u`'kalrk fuokj.k½ vf/kfu;e] 1989 ¼la'kks/ku] 2015½ ds fu"i{k] izHkkoh o 'kh?kz vuqla/kku dh izkFkZuk ds lkFk izLrqr dh xbZ gSA
2. fo}ku vf/koDrk ;kph@ifjoknh dk dFku gS fd izdj.k esa vuqla/kku vf/kdkjh }kjk izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 797@2023 esa izHkkoh ,oa fu"i{k :i ls vuqla/kku ugha fd;k tk jgk gS] vr% izdj.k
[2026:RJ-JP:7444] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-7193/2024] esa vuqla/kku vf/kdkjh dks funsZ'k fn;s tkos fd izdj.k esa ;Fkk'kh?kz izHkkoh ,oa fu"i{k vuqla/kku dh dk;Zokgh djsA
3. fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us ;kfpdk dk fojks/k djrs gq, dFku fd;k fd izLrqr ekeys esa vuqla/kku vf/kdkjh }kjk fu;ekuqlkj 'kh?kz] izHkkoh ,oa fu"i{k :i ls vuqla/kku fd;k tk jgk gS ,oa lkFk gh dFku fd;k fd ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; ds U;kf;d n`"Vkar Sakiri Vasu Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh, AIR 2008 Supreme Court 907 ds vuqlkj vuqla/kku ds i;Zos{k.k djus dh vf/kdkfjrk eftLVªsV dks miyC/k gS fQj Hkh ;kph@ifjoknh dks ;fn dksbZ O;Fkk gS rks og lacaf/kr vf/kdkfjrk okys eftLVsªV U;k;ky; ds le{k mifLFkr gksdj dk;Zokgh djus gsrq Lora= gSA
4. eSaus i=koyh dk lEekuiwoZd voyksdu fd;k rFkk mHk;i{k ds rdksZa ij xEHkhjrkiwoZd euu fd;kA
5.
ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk Sakiri Vasu (Supra) ds ekeys esa izfrikfnr O;oLFkk ds vuqlkj lacaf/kr vf/kdkfjrk okys eftLVsªV U;k;ky; dks vuqla/kku dk i;Zos{k.k djus dh vf/kdkfjrk izkIr gS] ,slh fLFkfr esa ;fn ;kph@ifjoknh dks mDr vuqla/kku ds lanHkZ esa dksbZ O;Fkk gS rks og lacaf/kr vf/kdkfjrk okys eftLVsªV U;k;ky; esa mifLFkr gksdj pkjktksgh djus gsrq Lora= gSA
6. ;kph@ifjoknh dh vksj ls ;fn dksbZ izkFkZuk i= fopkj.k U;k;ky; esa izLrqr fd;k tkrk gS] rks fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ls ;g vis{kk dh tkrh gS fd os mDr izkFkZuk i= dk fof/k vuqlkj 'kh?kzrk ls fuLrkj.k djssaxsA
7. vr% mijksDRk U;kf;d n`"Vkar esa izfrikfnr O;oLFkk dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, mDr ;kfpdk mijksDr vuqlkj fuLrkfjr dh tkrh gSA
8. izdj.k ls lacaf/kr ;fn dksbZ vU; izkFkZuk i= yafcr gksa] rks os Hkh fuLrkfjr fd, tkrs gSaA (BHUWAN GOYAL),J RAHUL KUMAR KHANDELWAL /8