DR. ANILKUMAR BHANUDASRAO SANAP AND OTHERS v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH POLICE INSPECTOR, POLICE STATION, SHIVAJI NAGAR, BEED AND OTHERS
CP/776/2016 · 2026-10-06
Contempt Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19235 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19235 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 907 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 776 OF 2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 907 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 776 OF 2016 DR. ANILKUMAR BHANUDASRAO SANAP AND OTHERS VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH POLICE INSPECTOR, POLICE STATION, SHIVAJI NAGAR, BEED AND OTHERS ... Adv. Rajdeep D. Raut, AGP for Respondents-State Adv. S. G. Nandedkar, Advocate for Respondent No.4 ...
CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.
DATED : 06/10/2026
Per Court: . Though the learned counsel for the petitioner has elevated as a Judge of this Court, the learned APP pointed out that the contempt petition is filed in respect of the interim order in Criminal Application No.2893 of 2016, whereby impugned order was stayed. The impugned order was for carrying out the investigation under Section 156(3) of Cr.P.C. and after representation of the crime the learned APP further submits that, as per the said impugned order, a crime was registered and charge-sheet is also filed.
2. Moreover, the Criminal Application No.2893 of 2016 has also finally disposed of on 19.10.2018. As such, the order under contempt is not in existence today. Accordingly, the petition stands
disposed of.
( VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J. ) ( SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J. ) shivani/ 2026:BHC-AUG:47273-DB