RENU SHARMA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
WPC/4685/2026 · 2026-07-06
Sri Ananda Sen
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19233 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19233 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:19659
Page | 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 4685 of 2026 ------ Renu Sharma, Wife of Dr. Mahendra Nath Sharma, aged about 45 years, resident Flat No.501, Block No.1, Garden Valley Apartment, Near Devi Mandir, PO-Hatia, PS-Jagarnathpur, Dist-Ranchi, Jharkhand.
… … Petitioner(s) Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand through Deputy Commissioner, PO – GPO, PS-Kotwali, Dist-Ranchi, Jharkhand.
2. Circle Officer, Namkum Anchal, PO & PS-Namkum Dist- Ranchi, Jharkhand.
… … Respondent(s) ------
CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------
For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. A.K. Sahani, Advocate
Mr. Shashank Shekhar, Advocate
For the Respondent(s) : Mr. Nawal Kishore Pandey, AC to SC (L&C)-I
------ 02/ 06th July, 2026
1.
Heard the parties.
2.
The Mutation Application of the petitioner has been dismissed by the Circle Officer, Namkum Anchal, Dist-Ranchi.
3.
Admittedly, the order impugned is appealable before the learned LRDC. Being the Appellate Court, he has power to appreciate, re-appreciate evidence and also take an independent view based on documents. If some documents are wanting, he has the power to call for the same and ask the parties to produce the same also.
4.
Thus, since there is a remedy of statutory appeal available to the petitioner, the petitioner should challenge the impugned order before the Appellate Authority, who will consider the same on merits and if some documents are necessary for arriving at a proper conclusion, the Appellate Authority may call for the same which should be produced. The Appellate Authority, since has the power of appreciating, re-appreciating evidence, will judge the issue and will pass an appropriate order, after giving an opportunity of hearing to all the parties concerned.
5.
It is made clear that the petitioner should file an appeal
2026:JHHC:19659
Page | 2
within two weeks along with an application for condonation of delay, which will be considered by the Appellate Authority, considering the pendency of this writ petition before this Court and it is expected that the appeal of the petitioner should be decided on merits.
6.
With the aforesaid observation, this writ petition stands
disposed of.
(ANANDA SEN, J.) 06th July, 2026
S.K.D/CP-2
Uploaded on 08.07.2026