[2026:RJ-JP:2486] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13470/2025 Veersingh Son Of Shri Munshi, Aged About 50 Years, Resident Of Dabra, Police Station Sapotra, District Karauli (Raj.). (The Accused-Petitioner Presently Confined In District Jail, Karauli). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15823/2025 Utsav @ Hemu @ Hemraj S/o Shri Munshi, R/o Dabra, Police Station Sapotra, District Karauli (Rajasthan) (Accused Confined In District Jail, Karauli) ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajneesh Gupta Mr. Aamir Khan Mr. Utkarsh Goyal Ms. Chanchal Mohd. Rahil Kalam For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh, PP Mr. M.S. Raghav Mr. Vishvas Saini HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 20/01/2026 1. The instant bail applications have been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioners. The accused- petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No. 224/2025 registered at Police Station Sapotra District Karauli Rural [2026:RJ-JP:2486] (2 of 4) [CRLMB-13470/2025] for the offences under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 103(1) and 333 of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. It is contended that prima facie offence under Section 108 of the BNS is not made out against the petitioners. Police in the investigation has concluded that there was a long rivalry between the parties and petitioners were insisted the deceased to pay the amount and soon before her death altercation took place between the parties. It is contended that the said altercation between the parties cannot be defined as instigation caused by the petitioners for commission of suicide. The accused-petitioners are in custody since long and the trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioners may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the complainant vehemently opposed the bail applications and contended that petitioners harassed the deceased and soon before commission of suicide she was subjected to beatings which caused her to commit suicide. It is also contended that against petitioners four cases were registered under various offences and they are habitual offenders, therefore, the bail applications of the accused- petitioners deserve to be dismissed. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties and after going through the conclusion drawn by the Investigating Officer, without commenting anything on the merits [2026:RJ-JP:2486] (3 of 4) [CRLMB-13470/2025] of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused- petitioners on bail. 6. Accordingly, these bail applications under Section 483 BNSS are allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners 1. Veersingh Son Of Shri Munshi 2 Utsav @ Hemu @ Hemraj S/o Shri Munshi, in connection with FIR No. 224/2025 registered at Police Station Sapotra District Karauli Rural shall be enlarged on bail provided they furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. The concerned trial Judge shall verify the address and contact details of the sureties through concerned SHO before releasing the accused-petitioners on bail. 7. The accused-petitioners are also directed to mark their presence on 25th of every month till conclusion of trial before the concerned police station. The SHO of the concerned police station shall send the presence report of the accused petitioners on the same day to the trial court every month. In case of any breach to the above condition, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the petitioners for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 8. The accused-petitioners are also directed to submit their present address along with the mobile number to the concerned SHO within seven days of release and the concerned SHO shall verify the said addresses and the mobile numbers. In case if the petitioners changes their address or mobile number, they shall [2026:RJ-JP:2486] (4 of 4) [CRLMB-13470/2025] submit the same before the concerned SHO so also before the concerned learned trial court. 9. A copy of this order shall be sent to the concerned SHO for its strict compliance. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J ashu /50-51