- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26105 WP No. 15807 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 15807 OF 2026 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. UDAY KUMAR, S/O. LATE RAMEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURIST, R/O. HEMMAKKI VILLAGE, KALASA HOBLI AND TALUK, CHIKAMAGALUR DISTRICT - 577 121. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. BALAKRISHNA M.R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS REVENUE SECRETARY, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, CHIKAMAGALUR DISTRICT - 577 101. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, CHIKAMAGALUR SUB-DIVISION, CHIKAMAGALUR DISTRICT - 577 101. Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26105 WP No. 15807 of 2026 4. THE TAHSILDAR AND SECRETARY, TALUK REGULARIZATION COMMITTEE, KALASA TALUK, CHIKAMAGALUR DISTRICT - 577 132. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.SPOORTHY HEGDE, .,ADVOCATE) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASHING THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 24.04.2026 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.3 ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER IN CASE NO.LNDRUC/127/2025 AS PER ANNEXURE-A AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for the respondents. 2. In this writ petition, the petitioner is assailing the impugned order dated 24.04.2026 passed by respondent No.3 at Annexure-A. 3. Learned AGA submitted that since the impugned order is passed under Section 136(2) of the - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26105 WP No. 15807 of 2026 Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 (for short 'Act') the petitioner is having efficacious remedy under the Act. 4. In that view of the matter, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the petitioner is having an efficacious remedy to approach Competent Authority under the provisions of the Act. The petition is disposed of with a liberty to approach Competent Authority under the provisions of the Act. 4. It is also made clear that the time spent by the petitioner before this court be condoned under Section 14 of the Limitation Act. Ordered accordingly. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE HR