2026:JHHC:19847 1 THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S). No. 4080 of 2026 ---------- Jai Ram Jha, aged about 67 years, S/o. late Bachchu Jha, r/o. 01, Janki Apartment, Sri Ram Vatika, Chira Chas, P.O. & P.S. Chas, Dist. Bokaro, Jharkhand-827013 ………. Petitioner Versus 1. Binod Bihari Mahto Koylanchal University, Dhanbad, through the Registrar, office at Subash Nagar, P.O. Nagnagar & P.S. Barwadda, District Dhanbad. 2. The Vice-Chancellor, Binod Bihari Mahto Koylanchal University, Dhanbad, Subash Nagar, P.O. Nagnagar & P.S. Barwadda, District Dhanbad. 3. The Registrar, Binod Bihari Mahto Koylanchal University, Dhanbad, Subash Nagar, P.O. Nagnagar & P.S. Barwadda, District Dhanbad. ………. Respondents. ---------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN ----------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Baibhaw Gahlaut, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Anoop Kr. Mehta, Advocate Mr. Amit Kr. Sinha, Advocate Mr. Shubham Malviya, Advocate ---------- 02/ 06.07.2026 By way of the present writ application the petitioner prays for following reliefs: (A) For issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order, direction upon the Respondents to grant Compensatory Earned Leave to the Petitioner for the period during which the Petitioner has served as the Controller of Examinations in Chas College Chas as per the Notification dated 28.11.2017 issued under the signature of the Registrar, Vinoba Bhave University. (B) For issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order, direction upon the Respondents to grant Earned Leave to the Petitioner for the period of 01.10.1991 to 30.09.1992 taking into consideration the Notification dated 03.10.1991 issued under the Registrar, Ranchi University by which the Ranchi University was declared as non-vacational University with effect from 01.10.1991 for a period of one year. 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that instant application may be disposed of by giving liberty to the petitioner to approach concerned respondents, so that his grievance raised in the writ application can be redressed. 2026:JHHC:19847 2 3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that since counter- affidavit has not been filed, if the petitioner so wishes, he may approach the concerned authorities for redressal of his grievances. 4. Having regard to the limited submissions of learned counsel for the parties, the instant writ application is hereby disposed of by directing the petitioner to file fresh representation before the respondent No. 3. The moment the respondent No. 3 will receive any such representation; he shall take decision in accordance with law and applicable rules and regulations within a period of three months from the date of receipt of such representation. 5. It goes without saying that if the decision is taken in favour of the petitioner, necessary consequential order be issued within a further period of four weeks. 6. As a result, the instant writ application stands disposed of. (Deepak Roshan, J.) 6th July, 2026 kunal/- Uploaded 08.07.2026