Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19217 (AP)

Andhra Satyanarayana v. Duppudi Satyavathi

AS/517/2009 · 2026-02-19

V Srinivas

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010143192009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3367] FRIDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE V SRINIVAS APPEAL SUIT NO: 517/2009 Between: 1. ANDHRA SATYANARAYANA, S/O. YERAKAYYA, HINDU BUSINESS R/O. D.NO. 46-16-47/2, DANAVAIPETA, RAJAHMUNDRY. 2. ANDRA SAROJINI, W/O. SATYANARAYANA, HINDU HOUSEWIFE R/O. D.NO. 46-16-47/2, DANAVAIPETA, RAJAHMUNDRY. 3. ANDRA NAGALINGESWARARAO, S/O. SATYANARAYANA, HINDU BUSINESS R/O. D.NO. 46-16-47/2, DANAVAIPETA, RAJAHMUNDRY. ...APPELLANT(S) AND 1. DUPPUDI SATYAVATHI, W/O. LATE JOGAYYA SASTRY SRIDHANA R/O. D.NO. 30-2-1, KUMMARASETTI VEEDHI, J.P.ROAD, RAJAHMUNDRY. 2. DUPPUDI SRINIVASACHARYULU, S/O. LATE JOGAYYA SASTRY EMPLOYEE R/O. D.NO. 30-2-1, KUMMARASETTI VEEDHI, J.P.ROAD, RAJAHMUNDRY. 3. DUPPUDI TATABBAYI, S/O. LATE JOGAYYA SASTRY EMPLOYEE R/O. D.NO. 30-2-1, KUMMARASETTI VEEDHI, J.P.ROAD, RAJAHMUNDRY. 4. ISUKAPALLI VENAKATARAMANA, W/O. SURYANARAYANA, HINDU HUSBAND'S PROTECTION R/O. D.NO. 29-9-65, MANDAPATIVARI VEEDHI, NEAR SANTHACHERUVU, ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 - Counsel for the Appellant(S): 1. S GANESH 2. ELEVATED AS JUDGE Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. M LAKSHMANA SARMA 2. T V JAGGI REDDY The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE V SRINIVAS APPEAL SUIT No:517 of 2009 JUDGMENT: Today when the matter is taken up, it is brought to the notice of this Court that notices sent to the appellant Nos.1 and 2were returned unserved with an endorsement “Addressee Deceased”. As per the postal track report, notice sent to the appellant No.3 was deliveredwith an endorsement “Item delivered to appellant No.3”. Despite service of notice, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant No.3 and thereby, it is apparent that he is not showing any interest in prosecuting the matter. 2. Accordingly, the Appeal Suit is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________ JUSTICE V.SRINIVAS Date:20.02.2026 KNN 4 37 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.SRINIVAS APPEAL SUIT No.517 of 2009 (Dismissed for default) Date: 20.02.2026 KNN