( 2026:JHHC:19887 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B. A. No. 3630 of 2026 1. Radheshyam Mahto, son of Bhaku Mahto, Age-38 years, at present resident of village Kulla Devi Niwas, Near Seventh Heaven Hotel, H.B. Road, Opposite Srilok Complex, Tharpakna, P.O. and P.S. Lalpur, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand 2. Jamuna Mahato, wife of Radheshyam Mahato, Age 33 years, at present resident of village Kulla Devi Niwas, Near Seventh Heaven Hotel, H.B. Road, Opposite Srilok Complex, Tharpakna, P.O. and P.S. Lalpur, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand ...... … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .…. … Opposite Party -------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioners :Ms. Aayushi Aman, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Amrita Kumari, Advocate 02/ 07.07.2026: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Lower Bazar P.S. Case No. 30 of 2026 registered under sections 329 (4), 352, 351(2), 351(3), 74, 331(2) and 3(5) of BNS, pending in the Court of learned J.M., Ist Class at Ranchi. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are caretaker of the disputed property. She next submits that informant has lodged the case against her brother-in-law and there is dispute between the informant and her brother-in-law however, brother-in-law of the informant has been granted anticipatory bail in A.B.A. No.2112 of 2026. She next submits that there is free fight between the informant and her brother-in-law as husband of the informant has died and all these aspects have been considered by this Court while disposing of the anticipatory bail of the brother-in-law in A.B.A. No. 2112 of 2026. On these grounds, she submits that the petitioners may kindly be provided privilege of anticipatory bail. 4. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer and submits ( 2026:JHHC:19887 ) that petitioners are accomplice of the brother-in-law of the informant. 5. There is dispute between the informant and her brother-in-law and the petitioners are said to be caretaker of the disputed property. There are general and omnibus allegations against the petitioners and brother-in- law of the informant has been granted anticipatory bail in the aforesaid A.B.A. 6. In the attending facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the above named, petitioners are directed to surrender before the learned court within three weeks from today and in the event of their surrender / arrest, the petitioners shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned J.M., Ist Class at Ranchi, in connection with Lower Bazar P.S. Case No. 30 of 2026, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of B.N.S.S, 2023. Dt.07.07.2026 ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) satyarthi-