Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19209 (JHR)

SADDAM QURAISI v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./6245/2026 · 2026-07-07

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:19982 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.6245 of 2026 ------ 1. Saddam Quraisi, aged about 34 years, son of Late Masuk Quraisi, Resident of House No.15/2, Kasai Mohalla, Riverside, P.O.- Daltonganj, P.S.-Daltonganj Nagar (Town), District-Palamu, Jharkhand. 2. Wasim Akram, aged about 34 years, son of Ghulam Rabbani, Resident of Pahadi Mohalla, Karbala Road, P.O.-Daltonganj, P.S.- Daltonganj Town, District-Palamu, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Piyush Pallav, Advocate : Mr. Sabyasanchi, Advocate For the State : Mr. Satish Prasad, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 07-07-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioners have moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Daltonganj P.S. Case No.117 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 111 and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 & Section 25(1-B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that each of the petitioners were in illegal possession of one country made pistol and 02 live cartridges. It is next submitted that the allegations against the petitioners are all false. It is then submitted that the charge sheet has been submitted in this case, but no witnesses have been examined as yet. It is further submitted that the petitioners undertake to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertake that they will not annoy or disturb the informant/victim or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioners have been in custody since 01.04.2026 as is evident from para-14 of this bail application. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the above-named petitioners on bail. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Palamu in connection with Daltonganj P.S. Case No.117 of 2026 with the condition that the petitioners will co- operate with the trial of the case and will furnish their mobile numbers and photocopy of the Aadhar Cards with an undertaking that they will not change their mobile numbers during the trial of the case, with further condition that they will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 07/07/2026 Abhiraj/