2026:JHHC:19846 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S). No. 4077 of 2026 ---------- 1. Sunil Kumar Goswami, Aged about-40 years, S/O-Devendra Nath Goswami, Residence of Vill- Masniya, P.O.-Maheshpur, P.S-Angara, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand. 2. Elisaba Minz, Aged about-46 years, D/O -Sudhir Minz, Residence-At- Shivshakti Nagar, Kokar, P.O-G.P.O., P.S-Sadar, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand. 3. Puspa Rajak, Aged about-43 years, D/O -Pannu Rajak, Residence of At-Lake Road, Tillu Nazeer Lane, Hindpiri, P.O.-P.S-Lohardaga, District-Loharadga, Jharkhand. 4. Pushpa Kumari, Aged about-37 years, D/O-Bajrang Toppo, Residence of Vill-Nagpheni, P.O. Nagpheni, P.S-Sisai, District-Gumla, Jharkhand. 5. Morjania Chaya Shital Soy, Aged about-40 years, D/O-Late Mukut Mani Soy, Residence of At- Hotwar Mahua Toli, P.Ο.-Hotwar, P.S-Sadar, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand. 6. Deependra Bahadur Singh, Aged about-49 years, S/O Amrendra Bahadur Singh, Residence of Vill- Kanuli, P.O.-Kishundaspura, P.S- Kishundaspura, District-Rai Bareli, Uttar Pradesh. 7. Bisheshwar Prasad Dangi, Aged about-37 years, S/O -Degan Mahto, Residence of Vill Sandh, P.O.-Sandh, P.S-Barka Gaon, District- Hazaribagh, Jharkhand. 8. Kiran Kumari, Aged about-37 years, W/O-Awadhesh Kumar, Residence of At Ward No.3, Sandh, P.O.-Barkagaon, P.S-Barkagaon, District-Hazaribagh, Jharkhand. ………. Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. The Principal Secretary, School Education and Literacy Department, Government of Jharkhand, Having its office at Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O.-Dhurwa, P.S.-Jagarnnathpur, Dist- Ranchi. 3. The Principal Secretary, Personal Administrative Reforms and Raj Bhasha Department, Govt. of Jharkhand, Having its office at Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. Dhurwa, P.S.-Jagarnnathpur, Dist- Ranchi 4. The Director, Secondary Education, Government of Jharkhand, Having its office at Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O.- Dhurwa, P.S.- Jagarnnathpur, Dist- Ranchi 5. The Chairman, Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission, Ranchi, Having its office at Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. Dhurwa, P.S.- Jagarnnathpur, Dist- Ranchi 6. The Secretary, Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission, Ranchi, Having its office at Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. Dhurwa, P.S.- Jagarnnathpur, Dist- Ranchi 7. The 'Examination Controller, Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission, Ranchi, Having its office at Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O.- Dhurwa, P.S.-Jagarnnathpur, Dist- Ranchi ………. Respondents. 2026:JHHC:19846 2 ---------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN ----------- For the Petitioners : M/s. Shubham Mishra, Gyandev Raj, Kazi Asif Iqubal, Advocates For the Respondents : Mr. Oishi Das, AC to AG M/s. Sanjoy Piprawall, Prince Kumar, Jay Prakash, Advocates ---------- 02/ 06.07.2026 This writ application has been preferred by the petitioners for following reliefs: “For issuance of appropriate writs)/ order(s)/ directions) particularly a writ in the nature of mandamus to prepare a commanding upon the respondents new/revised merit list, in respect of 8658 number of vacant posts of Trained Graduate Teachers, as advertised vide advertisement number 21/2016, dated 28.12.2016 and as has been left over after the confirmation of 9126 posts of TGT by the Respondents in favour of the already appointed candidates and in respect of the previous writ petitioners, by way of affidavit before the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Contempt Petition No. 612 of 2022, and connected petitions, arising in Civil Appeal No. 4044 of 2022 and connected Petitions, and to further direct the Respondents to consider the appointment of petitioners as they secured qualifying marks for the post of Trained Graduate Teacher in their respective subjects.” 2. At the outset learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the issue involved in this writ application is same and similar to that of W.P.(S). No. 582 of 2023 (Mina Kumari & Ors. Vs. the State of Jharkhand & Ors.) and other analogous cases, wherein a One-Man Fact-Finding Commission has been constituted and the petitioners want to approach the said Commission ventilating their grievances. 3. There is no objection from the other side. 4. Accordingly, the instant application stands disposed of with the liberty as prayed for. (Deepak Roshan, J.) 6th July, 2026 kunal/- Uploaded 08.07.2026