IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7445 of 2026 ====================================================== Gopal Singh Son of Late Ram Charitra Singh, Resident of Village- Sahnu, P.S. Magadh University, District- Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 2. The District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Gaya. 3. The Deputy Collector Land Reforms (DCLR), Sadar Gaya. 4. The Circle Officer, Bodh Gaya, Gaya. 5. Sumitra Devi, alleged wife of Late Chandrika Singh, R/o Vill.-Sahnu, P.S. Magadh University, Dist. Gayaji. 6. Rani Devi, Wife of Naresh Singh, Daughter of Late Chandrika Singh, R/o Vill. Sahnu, P.S. Magadh University, Dist. Gayaji, At present R/o Vill. Bariyama, P.S. Mali Dist. Aurangabad. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dhananjay Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Dr. Md. Raisul Haque, SC-10 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 2 23-06-2026 Heard the parties. 2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief(s): “(i) For issuance of a writ/writs, order/orders, direction/directions to the respondents to comply the order dated 12.05.2023 passed in B.L.T. Case No. 127/2019. (ii) For further issuance of writ/writs in the nature of Mandamus/Certiorari or any other Patna High Court CWJC No.7445 of 2026(2) dt.23-06-2026 2/3 appropriate writ to Quash the order dated 23.09.2025 passed by the Circle Officer, Bodh Gaya (Annexure 3) in the remitted mutation proceedings, whereby the proceedings were closed citing the pendency of a Title Suit. (iii) For direction to the Respondent No. 4 to comply strictly with the directions issued by the Bihar Land Tribunal, Patna in B.L.T. Case No. 127 of 2019 dated 12.05.2023, and pass a fresh speaking order on the mutation application in Mutation Case No. 690(K)/12-13 on its merits within a stipulated time frame. (vi) For any other relief/reliefs, to which the petitioner is entitled under law as well as facts and circumstance of the case.” 3. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he shall be challenging the order passed by the Circle Officer, Bodh Gaya, Gaya Ji in accordance with law. 4. Learned State counsel has no objection to it. 5. The writ petition stands disposed of allowing the petitioner to approach the concerned respondent with all the Patna High Court CWJC No.7445 of 2026(2) dt.23-06-2026 3/3 relevant documents within the period of four weeks who shall be taking up the matter and after noticing/hearing the parties, shall pass a reasoned order in accordance with law at an earliest. Adnan/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U