SARASWATI GANPATRAO MORE v. DR. PURUSHOTTAM BHAPKAR AND OTHERS
CP/187/2013 · 2026-10-09
Contempt Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19200 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19200 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
901 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 187 OF 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 901 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 187 OF 2013 IN WP/3030/2012 Saraswati D/o. Ganpatrao More Versus Dr. Purushottam Bhapkar And 2 Others __________________________________________________________ • Adv. Akram Inamdar h/f. Adv. Kazi S. S. for the Petitioner • Mr. S. J. Salgare, AGP for State __________________________________________________________
CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ. DATE : OCTOBER 09, 2026
ORDER : [PER VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J.] 1) Learned advocate Mr. Inamdar holding for Mr. Kazi, learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that the order under contempt is an interim order passed in the writ petition. Subsequently, the writ petition itself was disposed of on 26.04.2016. 2) In view of the disposal of the main writ petition, nothing survives in the contempt petition and the same is
disposed of.
(VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV) JUDGE (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE Komal Kamble
Page| 1 of 1 2026:BHC-AUG:48765