CS(COMM) 1404/2025 $~37 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC011061402025 + CS(COMM) 1404/2025 & I.As. 32469/2025, 32471/2025 ABBOTT PRODUCT OPERATIONS AG & ANR. .....Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Naqeeb Nawab and Mr. Vibhav Singh, Advocates. versus DR. REDDY S LABORATORIES LIMITED .....Defendant Through: Mr. Ranjan Narula, Mr. Shakti Priyan Nair, Mr. Parth Bajaj and Ms. Gitanjali Vohra, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH O R D E R % 17.09.2026 1. This suit is instituted by the Plaintiffs inter alia seeking a decree of permanent injunction against the Defendant and all others acting on its behalf from using the impugned mark BetVertin/ and/or any other mark/device/logo or trade name, which is identical and/or deceptively similar to Plaintiffs’ registered trademark VERTIN, in any manner whatsoever, without the permission, consent or license of the Plaintiffs, amounting to infringement and/or passing off. 2. By order dated 23.12.2025, this suit was decreed in terms of paragraph 97(a), (b), (c), (d) and (g) of the plaint in favour of the Plaintiffs and against the Defendant on a statement made on behalf of the Defendant This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/09/2026 at 11:02:23 CS(COMM) 1404/2025 that it was willing to discontinue the use of impugned marks BETVERTIN/ and to withdraw the pending trademark application as also to stop advertising the drug, with liberty to exhaust the existing stock by 31.03.2026. For remaining reliefs, the matter was adjourned to 06.05.2026. 3. On 13.03.2026, parties were referred for mediation to amicably resolve their disputes, on I.A. 6428/2026 being filed by the Defendant for reference. Parties have settled the disputes and Settlement Agreement dated 24.07.2026 has been executed, incorporating the terms of settlement. Defendant has inter alia agreed to pay a sum of Rs. 9,00,000/- to the Plaintiffs in full and final settlement of all their claims and the amount stands paid, which is acknowledged by counsel for the Plaintiffs. The terms of settlement are lawful and accordingly, the suit is decreed in favour of the Plaintiffs and against the Defendant in terms of the settlement read with paragraph 97(f) of the plaint, since Plaintiffs have given up the remaining reliefs. 4. Registry is directed to draw up the decree sheet. 5. Suit stands disposed of along with pending applications. JYOTI SINGH, J SEPTEMBER 17, 2026 S.Sharma This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/09/2026 at 11:02:23