Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:HHC:34055 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No. :
1069 of 2026 Decided on : 12.08.2026 Ajay Sharma …Petitioner Versus Anju Sharma …Respondent Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. H.S. Rawat, Additional Advocate General. Virender Singh, Judge (Oral) Instructions dated 11.08.2026, have been placed on record by learned Additional Advocate General. According to the office order annexed with the instructions, the claim of the petitioner has been considered and rejected. In view of the above discussion, no further order is required to be passed in this petition and the same is accordingly disposed of. 1 Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.
2 2026:HHC:34055 However, the petitioner is at liberty to avail appropriate remedy, in accordance with law, for redressal of his surviving grievances, if any, if so advised.
( Virender Singh ) August 12, 2026( ps ) Judge