[2026:RJ-JP:2248] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12327/2025 Raju Alias Rajesh S/o Lalchand, Aged About 40 Years, Resident Of Bambada, Police Station Sanganer, Jaipur (Raj.). (At Present Confined In District Jail, Jhalawar) ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajendra Singh Tanwar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sudesh Saini, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 19/01/2026 1. This bail application has been filed by the accused petitioner u/S 483 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 176/2025 registered at Police Station Asnawar, District Jhalawar for offences u/S 8/21, 8/29 of the NDPS Act. 2. Learned counsel for the accused petitioner submits that the accused petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case merely on the basis of the statements of the co-accused from whose possession the alleged contraband was recovered that they were going to deliver the contraband to the accused petitioner. Counsel also submits that no contraband is found to be recovered from the possession of the accused petitioner and he is in custody since 10.09.2025. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor, while opposing the bail application, submits that there is ample evidence collected during investigation which connects the accused petitioner with the alleged crime. [2026:RJ-JP:2248] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-12327/2025] 4. On perusal of the contents of the FIR, it is revealed that some contraband was recovered from the accused Govardan, Pulchand, Anjna Bai, Kela Bai, Mamtha Bai and Geeta Bai. 5. The accused persons from whose possession the contraband was recovered, alleged to have informed the investing agency that they were going to deliver that contraband to the present accused petitioner. There is no other evidence which seems to connect the accused petitioner with the alleged crime. The accused petitioner is said to be in custody since 10.09.2025. 6. Having regard to the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused petitioner and taking into consideration the allegation against him, the Court is convinced as regards the requirement of Section 37 of NDPS Act. Hence, this Court, without expressing any opinion on merits or demerits of this case, deems just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 7. Accordingly, this bail application is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided that he furnishes personal bonds in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only), together with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court or any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Gaurav Srivastava /55