( 2026:JHHC:19748 ) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 4264 of 2026 Meraj Ansari, aged about 21 years, S/o Jainul Ansari, R/o Village- Nagrito, Jainagar, PO & PS- Jainagar, District- Koderma. … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand. … … Opp. Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. A. K. Sahani, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Anup Pawan Topno, APP --- 05/06.07.2026 Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 17.03.2026 in connection with Jainagar P.S. Case No.33 of 2026 for the offences registered under Sections 87 / 352 / 351 (2) (3)/ 3(5) of the B.N.S. 2023 and the case is pending in the court of learned SDJM, Koderma. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Petitioner is in custody since 17.03.2026 and the victim is 16 years old at the time of recording her statement under Section 183 BNSS, 2023 and is a student of Class-X and she has stated that she was having relationship with the petitioner for the last four years. She also stated that at the instance of the petitioner, she went to Mumbai. 4. He further submits that though there is allegation in the FIR that certain video clipping was prepared, but no video clipping has recovered. He submits that the charge-sheet has been submitted on 12.05.2026. 5. Learned counsel for the opposite party-State has opposed the prayer. However, the aforesaid submissions made on behalf of the petitioner have not been disputed. 6. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the statement of the victim recorded under Section 183 BNSS, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on regular bail. 7. Accordingly, the petitioner above named is directed to be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the ( 2026:JHHC:19748 ) 2 satisfaction of learned SDJM, Koderma, in connection with Jainagar P.S. Case No.33 of 2026 on the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below. 8. Let this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through FAX/e-mail. 9. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) 06.07.2026 Uploaded sandeep/