1 APHC010140652026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] MONDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 7873/2026 Between: 1. JARUGUMALLI ASHOK, S/O JARUGUMALLI YESOBU, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.4-113/F, CHOWDAVARAM VILLAGE, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.522238 2. THE MANGALAGIRI TADEPALLI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, , REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.522503 3. MANDAVA VENKATA VINAJI, S/O MANDAVA VENKATESWAR RAO, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/O. D.NO 4-15, BHARATHPETA, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT 522002 ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MEDIKONDA PRANAY VENKAT CHOWDARY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. A S C BOSE (SC FOR MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS AP) 2. GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP 2 The Court made the following ORAL ORDER: Heard Sri MPV Chowdary, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner, Sri M. Srinu Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Municipal Administration & Urban Development and Sri S. Vijay Kumar, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri A.S.C. Bose. learned Standing Counsel for Mangalagiri Tadepalli Municipal Corporation. 2. Sri S. Vijay Kumar, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri A.S.C. Bose, learned Standing Counsel for Mangalagiri Tadepalli Municipal Corporation, has submitted the Written Instructions furnished by the Commissioner, Mangalagiri Tadepalli Municipal Corporation dated 26.03.2026. Copy of it is supplied to the learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner and the same is taken on record. 3. The Written Instruction would indicate that the Petitioner has not even submitted any Representation to the Corporation about his grievance so far. The Written Instruction would also indicate that it is a pure private dispute between the Writ Petitioner and the Unofficial Respondent No.3. 4. Having taken note of the same, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner, on instruction, seeks to withdraw this Writ Petition, with liberty to approach this Court, if there is any cause of action in future. 5. Request granted. 6. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the Writ Petitioner to approach this Court if there is any cause of action in the future. No order as to costs. 7. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt:30.03.2026 Vns