Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19189 (JHR)

SAMSUL ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./5291/2026 · 2026-07-07

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:19971 ] THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.5291 of 2026 ------ Samsul Ansari aged about 21 years, S/O Basir Ansari, R/o Village- Kenduatar, P.O. + P.S. –Karmatar, District- Jamtara. .... .... …. Petitioner. Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party. ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Rahul Ranjan, Advocate. For the State : Mrs. Amrita Kumar, A.P.P For the Informant : Mr. Kaushal Kishor Mishra, Advocate. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 07-07-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Narayanpur P.S. Case No. 20 of 2026 instituted under Section 103(1), 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in criminal conspiracy with the co-accused persons, murdered the husband of the informant namely Fukran Ansari. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false and the petitioner is not named in the FIR. It is further submitted that the co-accused person namely Israfil Ansari has been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 19.06.2026 in B.A. No. 5521 of 2026. It is next submitted that without putting the petitioner on TIP, as mentioned in para 03 of the supplementary affidavit, charge-sheet has been submitted against the petitioner. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in jail custody since 03.03.2026, as mentioned in para 23 of this bail application. It is next submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the trial of the case and undertakes not to annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case, hence, the petitioner may be admitted to bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposed the prayer for bail. Considering submissions of learned counsels and the facts as stated above, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Hence, the court below is directed to release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, at Jamtara in connection with Narayanpur P.S. Case No. 20 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 07/07/2026 Amar/